NDSL 8,584 Link page¿¡¼­ [¿ø¹®º¸±â] ¹öÆ°À» Ŭ¸¯Çϼ¼¿ä.

[±¹³»³í¹®]

& & ¡®EU ÇàÁ¤¹ý¡¯ À̶ó´Â ¿µ¿ªÀÌ Á¡Â÷ Çü¼ºµÇ°í ÀÖ°í, ƯÈ÷ EU¸¦ ±¸¼ºÇϴ ȸ¿ø±¹µéÀº µ¶ÀÏ, ÇÁ¶û½º¿Í °°Àº ´ë·ú¹ý°è ±¹°¡¿Í ¿µ±¹°ú °°Àº ¿µ¹Ì¹ý°è ±¹°¡°¡ °øÁ¸ÇÏ°í, EU ÇàÁ¤¹ý Çü¼º¿¡µµ À̵éÀÌ °øµ¿À¸·Î ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ EU ÇàÁ¤¹ý Â÷¿ø¿¡¼­ Çü¼ºµÈ ÇàÁ¤Ã³ºÐÀýÂ÷¸ðµ¨Àº »óÀÌÇÑ ¹ýÀüÅë¿¡¼­ °øÅëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁ¤µÇ´Â ±âº»ÀûÀÎ ¿øÄ¢¿¡ ¹ÙÅÁÇÏ°í, EU ÁýÇàºÎ°¡ Á÷¸éÇÏ´Â Çö½ÇÀû Á¦¾à¿¡ ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â Á¦3ÀÇ ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÑ´Ù.& & EU ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀº ¼º¹®¹ý¿ø ¿Ü¿¡µµ À¯·´¹ý¿øÀÇ ÆǷʹý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î Çü¼ºµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Âµ¥, À¯·´¹ý¿øÀÇ ÆÇ·Ê¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ÇàÁ¤ÀÔ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â ¸í¹®ÀÇ ±ÔÁ¤ÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡¸¸ û¹®±ÇÀ» ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏÁö¸¸, °³º°ÀûÀÎ ÇàÁ¤Ã³ºÐ¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â ¸í¹®ÀÇ ±ÔÁ¤ÀÌ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì¿¡µµ À̸¦ ÀÎÁ¤ÇÑ´Ù. û¹®±ÇÀÇ ±¸Ã¼Àû ³»¿ëÀ¸·Î´Â »çÀü°íÁö¸¦ ¹ÞÀ» ±Ç¸®¿Í ÆÄÀÏ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¢±ÙÀ» ÅëÇØ ½ÇÁúÀûÀ¸·Î û¹®À» ÁغñÇÒ ±Ç¸® µîÀº È®°íÇÏ°Ô º¸È£µÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ±³È£½Å¹®À» ¹ÞÀ» ±Ç¸®³ª ¼ÒÃß±â´É°ú ÆǴܱâ´ÉÀÇ ºÐ¸® µîÀ¸·Î ´ë½ÉÀû ±¸Á¶ ¼Ó¿¡¼­ óºÐ±ÇÇÑÀÌ Çà»çµÇµµ·Ï ÇÒ ±Ç¸® µîÀº ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÖ´Ù. ´Ù¸¸, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±Ç¸®µéÀº ¸í½ÃÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê´õ¶óµµ ºñ°ø½ÄÀû ¹æ¹ýÀ̳ª ´ë¾ÈÀû, º¸¿ÏÀû ¼ö´ÜµéÀ» ÅëÇØ °í·ÁµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ.& & °æÀï¹ý ÁýÇà°ú °°Àº °³º°ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ÀýÂ÷¿¡¼­´Â Á÷±ÇÁÖÀǸ¦ ±âº»À¸·Î Çϸ鼭 ´ç»çÀÚÀÇ ÀýÂ÷Àû ±Ç¸®¸¦ º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇØ ´ë½ÉÁÖÀÇÀû ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î Á¢¸ñÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¼ ¼öµµ ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¹ÄÁ´ë, EU ÁýÇàºÎÀÎ À§¿øȸ°¡ Á÷Á¢ ±ÔÁ¦ÁýÇà±ÇÇÑÀ» °¡Áö´Â ÀϹݰæÀï±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ °æ¿ì °æÀïÃѱ¹°ú µ¶¸³ÀûÀΠû¹®ÁÖÀç°üÀ» µÎÁö¸¸, û¹®ÁÖÀç°üÀÌ ±¸µÎû¹®À» ÁøÇàÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡µµ ±× ¿ªÇÒÀº ´ç»çÀÚÀÇ ÀýÂ÷Àû ±Ç¸® º¸Àå¿¡ ±¹Çѵǰí, ´çÇØ »ç¾ÈÀÇ ½ÇüÀû °áÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â ¿øÄ¢ÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¿©ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ¸Å¿ì Á¦ÇÑÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒ¸¸ ¼öÇàÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ ±×·¯ÇÏ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ±âº»ÀûÀ¸·Î Á÷±ÇÁÖÀÇÀû ±¸Á¶¸¦ °®°í ÀÖ´Â ¿ì¸® ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀ» Åä´ë·Î ÇâÈÄ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷ÀÇ °³¼±¹æÇâÀ» ¸ð»öÇØ º¼ ¶§ EUÀÇ °æÀï¹ý ÀýÂ÷ó·³ Á÷±ÇÁÖÀÇ¿¡ ´ë½ÉÁÖÀÇÀû ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ °ßÁö¿¡¼­ ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î Á¢¸ñÇÑ ¸ðµ¨ÀÌ À¯¿ëÇÑ Âü°í°¡ µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

[±¹³»³í¹®]

Paragraph 20 of the Korean Administrative Procedure Act (KAP A), which is in effect since 1999, requires Administrative Agency to set and publish in advance standards for administrative measures, thereby enhancing transparency and predictability of public administration. It is a meaningful procedural arrangement for those who seek to get business licenses, especially in highly competitive sectors such as ICT Service, Broadcasting Business etc. It tries to realize the constitutional doctrine of due process. There remain, however, so many issues unsolved, because there have been neither remarkable court cases nor intensive scholarly discussions regarding it. And it gets worse when it comes to licensing procedures for ICT or broadcasting business by administrative committees like Broadcasting Commission. What IS the minimum procedural requirement for its decision making, what kind of procedural rights are to be recognized for those applying for licenses, or whether those measures have to be nullified as illegal administrative act, which did not meet the standard setting and publishing requirement as stipulated in ¡× 20 KAPA? This article deals with those highly significant, but rarely tackled issues and recommends some theoretical and interpretational solutions for them.

[±¹³»³í¹®]

ÇöÇà ¿ì¸® ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀº ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¶·Ê¿¡ °üÇؼ­ ¾î¶°ÇÑ ±ÔÁ¤µµ µÎ°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê´Ù. ´Ù¸¸, º» ¹ýÀÇ Àû¿ëÁ¦¿Ü¸¦ Á¤ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â Á¦3Á¶2Ç×1È£¿¡¼­, ¡°±¹È¸ ¶Ç´Â Áö¹æÀÇȸÀÇ ÀÇ°áÀ» °ÅÄ¡°Å³ª µ¿ÀÇ ¶Ç´Â ½ÂÀÎÀ» ¾ò¾î ÇàÇÏ´Â »çÇס±Àº º» ¹ýÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù°í ÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ» »ÓÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª °ú°Å 2Â÷·Ê¿¡ °ÉÄ£ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ý ½Ã¾È¿¡¼­´Â ¸ðµÎ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¶·Ê¿¡ °üÇÑ ±ÔÁ¤À» µÎ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Áï 1994³â¿¡ °øÇ¥µÈ ½Ã¾È¿¡¼­´Â ¡°Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´ÜüÀÇ »ç¹«¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©´Â Á¶·Ê·Î½á Ưº°ÀýÂ÷¸¦ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù(½Ã¾È Á¦3Á¶3Çס±)°í ÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, 1996³â6¿ù ½Ã¾ÈÀº ¡°Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´ÜüÀÇ »ç¹«¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©´Â ÀÌ ¹ýÀÇ ¹üÀ§¾È¿¡¼­ Á¶·Ê·Î½á Ưº°ÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¸¦ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. (½Ã¾È Á¦3Á¶2Ç×)°í ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º»°í´Â ¹Ù·Î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦Á¡ÀÇ ÀνÄÇÏ¿¡¼­ Áö¹æºÐ±ÇÀÇ ½Ã´ë, ÁÖ¹ÎÂüÁ¤ÀÇ ½Ã´ë¸¦ ¸ÂÀÌÇÏ¿©, ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀÇ Á¤½Å¿¡ ¸Â´Â Áö¿ª µ¶ÀÚÀÇ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¶·Ê¸¦ Á¦Á¤ÇÒ ¼ö Àְڴ°¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ý¸®Àû °ËÅ並 ÇàÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÊÀÚ´Â Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´Üü°¡ µ¶ÀÚÀÇ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¶·Ê¸¦ Á¦Á¤ÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ Ưº°È÷ ¹®Á¦´Â µÇÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù. ¿Ö³ÄÇϸé, µ¿¹ýÀÌ ½Ã¾ÈÀÇ ±ÔÁ¤¿¡ ºñÇؼ­´Â ºñ·Ï ÈÄÅðÇÑ °Í °°Àº Ç¥ÇöÀ» ¾²°í´Â ÀÖÁö¸¸, ÀÌ´Â ¹ý·üÇؼ®À¸·Îµµ ½Ã¾È°ú °°Àº ¹ýÀû È¿°ú¸¦ ³¾ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÒ ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹ýÇؼ®ÀÇ ±¸Ã¼È­¸¦ À§Çؼ­ ÇÊÀÚ´Â ÀϺ»¿¡¼­ÀÇ ³íÀǸ¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î µÎ ¹ý¿µ¿ª(ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ý°ú ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¶·Ê)°£ÀÇ ¹ý¸®Àû ¹®Á¦¸¦ ³»¼Å³Î¹Ì´Ï¸Ø·Ð°ú Ç¥Áعý·ÐÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î °íÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³»¼Å³Î¹Ì´Ï¸Ø(National Minimum)·ÐÀº ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀº ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¶·Ê¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â ¡®¹Ì´Ï¸Ø ¹ý¡¯À̶ó°í ÇÏ´Â ¼³ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ´Â ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀº Àü±¹ÀûÀÎ ÃÖ¼Ò±âÁØ(¶Ç´Â ÃÖÀú±âÁØ)À» Àü±¹ÀûÀÎ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î Á¤ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´ÜüÀÇ Á¶·Ê·Î ¹ýÁ¤ÀýÂ÷ÀÇ Àû¿ëÁ¦¿Ü³ª ¿ÏÈ­Àû ¼öÁ¤À» µÎ´Â °ÍÀº ¿øÄ¢ÀûÀ¸·Î À§¹ÝÀ¸·Î µÈ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ºñÇØ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀº ¿ÀÈ÷·Á Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´Üü¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¿¡ À־´Â ÀÏÁ¾ÀÇ Ç¥ÁعýÀ̶ó°í Çؼ®ÇؾßÇÑ´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇÏ´Â ÀÌ·ÐÀÌ´Ù. Áï º»¹ýÀº Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´ÜüÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷ Á¶·Ê¿¡ À־´Â ÇϳªÀÇ Ç¥ÁØÀûÀÎ ±âÁØÀ» Á¦½ÃÇØ ÁÖ°í Àִ ǥÁعý ³»Áö´Â ÁØÄ¢¹ýÀ̶ó´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ý°ú °³º°¹ý°úÀÇ °ü·Ã¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©, ÀÌ ¹®Á¦´Â °³º°¹ýÀÇ ±ÔÁ¤°ú ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ ¿¬°üÀ» °¡Áø ¹®Á¦ÀιÙ, ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, Á¶·Ê¿¡´Â ¸Ã±æ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù´Â ÃëÁö°¡ ¹ý·ü¿¡¼­ ¸í¹éÇÏ°Ô Á¤ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Á¶·Ê¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷ÀÇ Á¦Á¤Àº ¾î·Æ´Ù°í ÇÏ°Ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª À§¿Í °°Àº ±ÔÁ¤ÀÌ ¾ø´Â ÇÑ, °¢ °³º°¹ýÀÇ °³º°ÀûÀÎ °ËÅ並 ÇÑ ÈÄ¿¡ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷ Á¶·ÊÀÇ Á¦Á¤°¡´É¼ºÀº ÃæºÐÈ÷ °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù°í º»´Ù. ¿ì¸® ´ë¹ý¿øÀÇ ÆǷʵµ °³º°¹ý¿¡¼­ ¾î¶² ±ÔÁ¤À» ÇÏ°í Àִ°¡¿¡ µû¶ó ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀÇ Àû¿ëÁ¦¿Ü ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.ÇâÈÄ ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡´ÜüµéÀÌ ±× ¿ª»çÀû »ç¸í°ú Ã¥ÀÓ°¨À» °¡Áö°í µ¿¹ýÀÇ ÃëÁö¸¦ ±¸Ã¼È­ÇØ ³ª°¥ ÇϳªÀÇ Á¦µµÀû ÀåÄ¡·Î¼­ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¶·Ê¸¦ Á¦Á¤ÇØ ³ª°¡ ¶§, À§¿¡¼­ »ìÆ캻 º»°íÀÇ °íÂûÀÌ Âü°í°¡ µÇ¾úÀ¸¸é ÇÊÀڷμ­´Â ÀÌ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ±â»ÝÀº ¾ø´ÙÇÏ°Ú´Ù. ¾Æ¿ï·¯ Áö¹æºÐ±ÇÀÇ ½Ã´ë¿¡ Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÖ¹ÎÀÇ ÇàÁ¤Âü¿©¸¦ À§ÇÏ°í ÇàÁ¤ÀÇ Åõ¸í¼º°ú °øÁ¤¼ºÀ» ´ãº¸Çϱâ À§ÇÑ Áö¿ªÀÇ Æ¯¼ö¼º°ú µ¶ÀÚ¼ºÀ» »ì¸° °³¼º ÀÖ´Â Á¶·ÊÀÇ ÃâÇöÀ» ±â´ëÇØ º¸´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.

[±¹³»³í¹®]

Áö±Ý±îÁö ÇàÁ¤ÇеµµéÀº ïáëùÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÁÖ·Î °á°úÀ±¸®·Î¼­ÀÇ ÝÂÛÕîÜ ïáëù¿¡ ÇÑÁ¤ÇØ ³íÀÇÇÏ´Â °üÇàÀ» ±»Çô ¿Ô´Ù. ÀüÅëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀýÂ÷¿¡ ´ëÇØ Áö´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀ» Ç¥¸íÇØ ¿ÔÀ½¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í, ÇàÁ¤ÇеµµéÀº ÀýÂ÷À±¸®·Î¼­ÀÇ ï½ó­îÜ ïáëù¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â ÁøÁöÇÑ °ü½ÉÀ» ±â¿ïÀÌÁö ¸øÇØ ¿Ô´Ù. ¿ì¸®´Â ¿ÂÀüÇÑ ÇàÁ¤Àû Á¤ÀÇ·ÐÀ» Á¤¸³Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¹èÀû Á¤ÀǷаú ´õºÒ¾î ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇ·ÐÀ» ±¸¼ºÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. º» ³í¹®Àº Ưº°È÷ 70³â´ë Áß¹Ý ÀÌÈÄ È°¹ßÈ÷ Àü°³µÇ¾î ¿Â ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¼º°ú¿¡ ÈûÀÔ¾î ¹ÎÁÖÇàÁ¤¿¡ °É¸Â´Â ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇ·ÐÀÇ ±¸¼ºÀ» ½ÃµµÇÑ´Ù. ¸ÕÀú, ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇÀÇ °³³äÀû ¼º°ÝÀ» ¹àÈ÷°í, ¹ÎÁÖÁÖÀÇ¿Í ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇÀÇ º»ÁúÀû °ü·Ã¼ºÀ» ÆľÇÇϸç, ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇÀÇ Áؼö¸¦ ¹æÇØÇÏ´Â Æí°ßµéÀ» °ËÅäÇÑ´Ù. ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î, °æÇèÀû ¿¬±¸°á°úµé·ÎºÎÅÍ ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇ°¡ Á¤Ä¡Àû ¹ÝÀÀ ¹× Æò°¡¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÏ°üµÈ ¿µÇâÀ» È®ÀÎÇÑ´Ù. ¶Ç, ÀýÂ÷¿ä¼Òµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÐÀÚµéÀÇ ºÐ·ùµéÀ» ÀϺ°ÇØ º¸°í, ±¹¹ÎÀÇ ÀÔÀå¿¡¼­ Á¤ºÎÀÇ Á¤Ã¥°úÁ¤À» µµ´öÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¸¦ »óÁ¤Çϸ鼭 ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ºÐ·ùµéÀ» Âü°íÇÏ¿© ¹ÎÁÖÁÖÀÇÀ̳信 ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ ÀýÂ÷¿ä¼Ò¸ñ·ÏÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦Å׸é, ±¸Á¶Àû ÀýÂ÷¿ä¼Ò·Î¼­ Âü¿©(¹ß¾ð±Ç, ´ëÇ¥¼º), ÀÏ°ü¼º, ±³Á¤°¡´É¼º, °ø°³¼º, Æí°ßÀÇ ¾ïÁ¦, È£¼ÒÀÇ ±âȸ¸¦, ´ëÀÎÀû ÀýÂ÷¿ä¼Ò·Î¼­ Á¤Á÷¼º(Áعý¼º), °ü¿ëÀÇ Á¤½Å, ÀÌÀ¯¼³¸íÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÑ´Ù. ³¡À¸·Î, ÀýÂ÷Àû Á¤ÀÇÀÇ Å¸¶ô°¡´É¼º°ú ÇѰ踦 Àû½ÃÇÑ´Ù. º» ³í¹®ÀÌ ´Ù·é ´Ù¾çÇÑ ³»¿ëÀº ÈÄ¼Ó ¿¬±¸µé¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀÌ·ÐÀÇ ±íÀÌ¿Í ³ÐÀ̸¦ ´õÇØ¾ß Çϸç, ´õ¿í È®°íÇÑ °æÇèÀû ÁöÁö¸¦ È®º¸ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.

[±¹³» ÇÐÀ§³í¹®]

Çö´ëÀÇ ú¼ïÙ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÷Öð¤´Â ãùô÷ÛöîÜÀÎ ¸é¿¡¼­ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ï½ó­ÛöîÜÀÎ ¸é¿¡¼­µµ ñìé©àõÀÌ Ý©Ê¾µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. °Å±â¿¡´Â ï½ó­ÀÇ îêïáÀ» ñìãÊÇÏ´Â çÈÚ¸ÛöÀÇ ¿µÇâÀÌ Å©±âµµ ÇÏ°ÚÁö¸¸ ú¼ïÙÓßßÚÀÇ ÜÜíÚûù, ´Ù¾çÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ú¼ïÙÝÂå¯ÀÇ Û¡î÷, ú¼ïÙÀÇ îöÚ¦ûù¡¤Ðüâúûù¶ó°íÇÏ´Â úÞãùù»¿¡¼­´Â ìéÚõîÜ¡¤õÎßÚîÜ ãùô÷ÛöЮ·Î½á ú¼ïÙíÂéÄÀ» Юð¤ÇÏ´Â °Í°ú ¶ÇÇÑ ú¼ïÙÀÇ ãùô÷ØüÀÇ îêÜú¸¦ Ûöê¿¡¼­ ÅëÁ¦ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ùÚÍ£¿¡ ºÎµúÈ÷°Ô µÇ¾ú±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ú¼ïÙíÂéÄ¿¡ À־ ï½ó­Ð®ïÒÀ» ïÚÝáÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÏÐÚÅÀÇ ÏíìÌÀ» ÜÁûÞÇÏ°í ú¼ïÙ̽ïÒÀÇ îêïáÀ» ÜÁî¡ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¾Æ´ÏµÈ´Ù. ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â Ô¼ìï, ÇÁ¶û½º, ¿À½ºÆ®¸®¾Æ¿Í °°Àº ÓÞ×ÁÛöÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ¸·Î ú¼ïÙÀÇ ãùô÷ÛöÀÇ Á¤ºñ¿¡¸¸ Ãæ½ÇÇØ ¿Ô°í ï½ó­ÛöîÜÀÎ ¸éÀº ¼ÒȦÇØ ¿Â °ÍÀÌ »ç½ÇÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÅëÀÏµÈ ìéÚõ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀº ¾ø°í, ÊÀ ËÁܬÛö¿¡ ï½ó­Ûö ЮïÒÀÌ À־ ´Ù¼Ò ú¼ïÙï½ó­¸¦ Юð¤ÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª, ÐÎÒ´¿¡ ¿Í¼­´Â ú¼ïÙï½ó­¿¡ °ü½ÉÀ» º¸¿© ú¼ïÙï½ó­Ûö ð¤ïÒ¿¡ ¸¹Àº Ò½ÕôÀ» °æÁÖÇÑ °á°ú 1987³â 7¿ù¿¡´Â ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀ» í¡ÛöçãͱÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ìéÚõú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀÌ ð¤ïÒµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª ïÙݤ°¡ ÏÐüå¿¡ áêÜõÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¹Ç·ÎÇؼ­ ¾ÆÁ÷±îÁö ð¤ïÒµÇÁö ¸øÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ 1989³â¿¡ ÏÐÙâõÅ×â ýºÖµ Á¦ 235È£·Î ¡ºÐñÜâÏíÜÁî¡À» À§ÇÑ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ê¡ç½ò¦öÜ¡»ÀÌ Û¡ÖµµÇ¾î¼­ 1990³â 3¿ù 1ÀϺÎÅÍ ã¿ú¼µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÌ ê¡ç½ò¦öܵµ ú¼ïÙï½ó­Ûö(äÐ)ÀÌ ú¼ïÙô¥ÝÂï½ó­, ú¼ïÙí¡Ûöçãͱï½ó­, ú¼ïÙͪüñü¬ïÒï½ó­ µî¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© ЮïÒÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª ê¡ç½ò¦öÜÀº ú¼ïÙô¥ÝÂï½ó­¸¸À» ЮïÒÇÏ°í ÀÖ´ÂÁ¡, Ûö×ÈÀÇ Çü½ÄÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ú¼ïÙЮöÎÀÇ Çü½ÄÀÎ ýºÖµÀ¸·Î ú¼ïÙï½ó­¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© Юð¤ÇÏ°í À־ ±× ãùüùàõÀÌ Àǽɽº·¯¿î Á¡ µî ¸î°¡Áö Ùýð¹ïÇÀ» Ò®øÐÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ìéÚõîÜÀ¸·Î ÏÐÚÅÀÇ ÐñÜâÏíÀÇ û¡à÷°ú ú¼ÞÅ ¹× öÕúª¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ »çÇ×Àº Ûö×ÈÀÇ û¡ãÒÀ¸·Î ±ÔÁ¤µÇ¾î ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡°ú, úÞú¼ úÊÛö Á¦ 123Á¶ 1Ç×ÀÇ îêÛöï½ó­ðÉú£¿¡ ëîËàÇÏ¿© ìéÚõú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀÇ ð¤ïÒÀÌ Àý½ÇÈ÷ é©ØеǾîÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Üâ ÒÕÙþ¿¡¼­´Â ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÀÇ ëòëù ¹× ù±é©àõ, ú¼ïÙï½ó­¸¦ ÌÀÇÑ ú¼ïÙú¼êÓÀÇ üùÕô, ±×¸®°í èâÏÐÀÇ í¡ÛöçÓ¸¦ °£´ÜÈ÷ »ìÇÇ°í, ¿ì¸® úÞú¼ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÀÇ úÊÛöîÜ ÐÆËà¿Í ±×ÀÇ Ùýð¹ïÇ°ú ËÇà¼óþ¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© °íÂûÇÑ µÚ 1987³â ïÙݤ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ í¡ÛöçãͱµÈ ú¼ïÙï½ó­Ûö(äÐ)ÀÇ ³»¿ë°ú Ùýð¹ïÇÀ» °ËÅäÇÏ°í ±×¿¡ ±âÇØ Ì¿ÖåÀ» µµÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù.

[±¹³»³í¹®]

& & ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷´Â ÇàÁ¤Ã»ÀÌ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© °ÅÄ¡´Â ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ ÀýÂ÷·Î¼­ ³ÐÀº Àǹ̷δ ÀÔ¹ýÀýÂ÷³ª »ç¹ýÀýÂ÷¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇÏ´Â ÇàÁ¤Ã»ÀÌ ÇàÇÏ´Â ¸ðµç ÀýÂ÷¸¦ ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. ±×·¸Áö¸¸ ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀº ÀÏÂ÷Àû óºÐÀýÂ÷¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î Çϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¿Í ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀýÂ÷´Â ¼­·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ´Â Á¦µµ·Î µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷ ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡µµ °¢ °³º°¹ý¿¡¼­´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¿¡ °üÇÑ ±ÔÁ¤µéÀ» µÎ°í ÀÖ´Ù.& & ÀÌó·³ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ÀýÂ÷·Î ÀÌÇصǰí ÀÖ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷Á¦µµµéÀº ¡®ÇàÁ¤ÀÌ °ÅÄ¡´Â ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ ÀýÂ÷¡¯·Î¼­ ±¹¹ÎÀÇ ±ÇÀÍÀ» ±¸Á¦ÇÏ´Â ±â´ÉÀ» ÇÏ´Â ÀýÂ÷¶ó´Â °øÅëÁ¡À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î, ÇàÁ¤°áÁ¤¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁöÀÇ »çÀüÀýÂ÷¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ ÇàÁ¤°áÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ºÒº¹ÇÏ´Â ÀýÂ÷±îÁö¸¦ ÇϳªÀÇ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷·Î ÅëÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇØÇÏ°í À̸¦ Á¦µµÈ­ÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. À̸¦ À§Çؼ­´Â ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ý°ú ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆǹýÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â ¹æ¾È, ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ý¿¡ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¿Í ÇàÁ¤ºÒº¹À» ¿¬°èÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¤À» µÎ´Â ¹æ¾È, ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆǹý¿¡ ¹Î¿øÀýÂ÷³ª ÀÌÀǽÅû¿¡ °üÇÑ ÅëÄ¢ÀûÀÎ ±ÔÁ¤À» µÎ´Â ¹æ¾È µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀýÂ÷ÅëÇÕ¹æ¾ÈÀÌ ¿¬±¸µÉ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù.& & ƯÈ÷ ÀÌÀǽÅûÀº ¹«¼öÈ÷ ¸¹Àº °³º°¹ý¿¡¼­ Á¦°¢°¢ ±ÔÁ¤À» µÎ°í ÀÖ¾î ÀÌÀǽÅû°ú ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ÀÌÇØÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÎÁö Çö½ÇÀûÀ¸·Î ¹®Á¦°¡ Á¦±âµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ¹®Á¦´Â ƯÈ÷ ÀÌÀǽÅûÀ» °ÅÄ£ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀ» û±¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö ¿©ºÎ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±ÔÁ¤ÀÌ ¸íÈ®ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Å³ª ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ÁÖ·Î ¹®Á¦°¡ µÈ´Ù. ½ÇÁ¦·Î Áö¹æÀÚÄ¡¹ý Á¦140Á¶ÀÇ ÀÌÀǽÅûÀ» °ÅÄ£ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀÌ Çã¿ëµÇ´ÂÁöÀÇ ¿©ºÎ¿Í °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀ§¿øȸµéÀÇ Çؼ®°ú Àû¿ëÀÌ ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù´Â ¹®Á¦°¡ ÀÖ´Ù.& & ÀÌ ¹®Á¦´Â °á±¹ ÀÔ¹ý·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌÀǽÅû¿¡ °üÇÑ ÅëÀÏÀûÀÎ ±ÔÁ¤À» ¸¶·ÃÇϰųª, ÀÌÀǽÅû°ú ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀ» ÅëÇÕÇϰųª, ¶Ç´Â ÀÌÀǽÅûÀ» ±ÔÁ¤ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °³º°¹ýµéÀ» Á¤ºñÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÅëÇؼ­ ÇØ°áÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÔ¹ýÀû Á¤ºñ ÀÌÀüÀ̶ó ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ, ÀÌÀǽÅû¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÒº¹ÀýÂ÷¿¡ °üÇÑ º°µµÀÇ ±ÔÁ¤ÀÌ ¾ø°Å³ª ºÒ¸íÈ®ÇÑ °æ¿ì ´ç¿¬È÷ ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù°í º¸¾Æ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. Ưº°ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ ´Ü¼ø ÀÌÀǽÅûÀ» °ÅÃÆ´Ù°í ÇàÁ¤½ÉÆÇÀ» Á¦ÇÑÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ±¹¹ÎÀÇ ÀçÆÇû±¸±ÇÀ» Áö³ªÄ¡°Ô Á¦ÇÑÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̱⠶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù.

[±¹³»³í¹®]

Perhaps no other legal term is so ambiguous as ‵due process of law¡Ç in American public law. This institute is deeply rooted in American legal history. Although it originated from English legal tradition, the meaning and importance of ‵due process of law¡Ç in the U.S.A. today is quite different from that of its homeland. We can find the procedural protection clause in the articles 5 and 14 of Federal Constitution. By these clauses citizens are protected from the illegal actions of agencies not only for substantial grounds, but also for procedural reasons. The main object of this thesis is to make clear the current situation of protection of procedural rights under Administrative Procedure Act, which was enacted in 1946. We might say with confidence that American administrative law has been greatly developed owing to this statute. But it is not so easy to make out every practical aspects of the act. As usual, the words in statutes are abstract and general. The concrete meaning of legal terms is shaped through the decisions of courts. The U.S. Supreme Court has made many important decisions regarding due process. In this article, I tried to explain scope and limits of procedural rights expressed through the decisions of courts. Procedural rights consist of due process by the constitution with APA and (mere) procedural rights by other statutes. When some acts provide procedure for agency action, they are expected to be observed by governments. But many people insist they have injury in fact because an agency did not follow the process of law. However the legal consequence of non-observance of procedural clauses is often argued. In Lujan v. Defenders of Wild Life(504 U.S. 555), the court stated that "The person who has been accorded a procedural right to protect his concrete interest can assert that right without meeting all the normal standards for redressability and immediacy." With this case the meaning and importance of procedural clause is still waiting to be materialized. It has passed several years since Korean Administrative Procedure Act became effective. An act cannot change the whole atmosphere of administrative procedure. Many officials seem to regard administrative process as accessaries of their decisions. More efforts should be made to promote the process of law. I think administrative procedure will enhance substantial fairness, too. In judicial review, more attention should be paid on the administrative procedural aspects. By making administrative order in due process, administrative effectiveness can be achieved along with the perfect protection of citizens¡Ç rights.

[ÇØ¿Ü³í¹®]

Draft of ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹, which in the process of legislation in National Assembly, is expected to enhance the transparency and efficiency in public administration through systematic regulation of dispersed administrative law and regulations. For this expectation is to be realized, it is necessary to establish the relationship between ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ and ¡¸Administrative Procedure Act¡¹. From the comparative law perspective, regulation type of general administrative actions is classified into two types: 1) administrative procedure act model (Germany, Spain, United States, Japan, Taiwan), 2) general administrative act model (Netherlands, Mongolia). Republic of Korea shows uniqueness because it will entail both administrative procedure act and general administrative act. When the relationship between ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ and ¡¸Administrative Procedure Act¡¹ is analyzed, following points can be found. First, both acts¡¯ regulation scope is different. ¡¸Administrative Procedure Act¡¹ focuses on the ¡®procedure¡¯ of ¡®disposition¡¯, while ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ regulates ¡®substance and procedure¡¯ of ¡®other administrative actions other than disposition like public law contract¡¯ and ¡®substance¡¯ of ¡®disposition¡¯. Furthermore, ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ regulates the guidelines for legislation and statutory interpretation. Second, ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ complements which is not covered by ¡¸Administrative Procedure Act¡¹ (loss of power, public contract, etc.), ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹, in conjunction with ¡¸Administrative Procedure Act¡¹, contributes to strengthening administrative procedure (criteria of sanction disposition, process of legislation, etc.). In the future, both acts should be developed as follows. First, according to each issue, there can be an issue which needs integrative regulation either ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ or ¡¸Administrative Procedure Act¡¹. Notice to public agency is a typical example of this integrative regulation. Second, ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ should be viewed not only as ¡®behavioural norm¡¯ but also ¡®judicial norm¡¯. The density of application of judicial norm can be diverse according to each provisions in ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹. Third, in the long run, ¡¸Framework Act on Public Administration¡¹ and ¡¸Administrative Procedure Act¡¹ should be integrated. With this integration, priority of both act¡¯s application will not become an issue, and systematic regulation of administrative law will be possible.

[±¹³» ÇÐÀ§³í¹®]

Nowadays the administration has enlarged its area and requires more techniques due to the particularity of the welfare state or the administrative state accomplishment of which is the mission of the modern state. Therefore the modern administrative law has the problem how to balance the both goals-the strengthening of the administrative power and the protection of the human right. In the past time, the law-governing principle is not so perfect enough to solve the above-mantioned problem. The 'principle of administration by law' or the 'principle of rule of law' is the concept that the administration must be exercised in compliance with the law and when any right or interest of a person is infringed by the illegal administration, the person may expect only ex-post facto remedy by the court. But the right or interest itself may not be restored by the ex-post facto remedy once it is infringed. It is requested by the recent 'law governing principle' to set up the systematic device beforehand in order to eliminate illegal infringement during the course of agency action. The above request by law-governing principle generates the legislation of the Administrative Procedure. In 1926 the 'Administrative Procedure Act' in Austria, in 1946 the 'Federal Administrative Procedure act(APA)' in the United States of America, in 1976 the 'Administrative procedure Act' in the West Germany(Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz = VwVfG) were legislated respectively and in sereral countries, the administrative procedure act has been legislated and now comes into force or the draft of the act has been prepared. This study is as follows; Chapter ¥°is an introductory remarks explaining the purpose, the necessity and the object of this paper. Chapter ¥± deals with explaining the particularity of administrative procedure Chapter ¥² explains the relation between administrative law and the principle of the rule of law (Herrschaft des Ge-setzes). In the chapter ¥³ the formation and the concept of the administrative procedure Act of each country of U.S.A. and west Germany and Austria are surveyed 'The Federal administrative procedure Act' of the U.S.A(APA) may be classified as the rule-making procedure and the adjudication procedure. It gives emphasis on systematic protection of rights so that it may provides the fundamental procedures such as notice and hearing, to the person whose right may be infringed before decision The Administrative Procedure act of West Germany was legislated in 1976. The model draft of the Administrative Procedure Act(Mu-sterwurl eines Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetzes=EVWVerf G) was prepared in 1963 and after 13-year long deliberate examination VwvfG was legislated. It prescribes not only procedural matters of the administration but also substantial matters of the administration. i.e, 'Neben bestimmuggen zum Verwaltungsakt'. 'Bestandskraft des Verwaltungsaktes ' and 'offentlichrechthcher Vertrag'. It provides the formality of each agency action to keep the appropriateness and smoothness of the administration In the last Chapter ¥´, the activities to legislate the administrative procedure act in our country and the present feature of the procedural provisions in each act are surveyed. Our country has not had a uniform act on the administrative procedure act but each act shows the fundamental procedures such as notice and hearing as the procedural protection system of rights. As the conclusion, the administrative procedure act will ensure the democratization and fairness of the administration, the proper protection of rights, the smoothness and the effectiveness of the administration by setting up uniform guidelines on exercising agency authority, simplification and precision on legislation and rationalization of the administrative remedy system In out country the legislation of the administrative procedure act is urgently expected.

[ÇØ¿Ü³í¹®]

Article 107 (3) of the Constitution explicitly requests that the administrative appeal procedure be enacted as a quasi-judicial procedure, but it does not explicitly request this in the remaining areas of the administrative procedure.However, as there was a recent controversy in the case of the Minister of Justice in the disciplinary case against the Prosecutor General, there is a trend toward a three-dimensional structure like a quasi-judicial procedure in order to encure the fairness of judgment in general administrative procedures.However, due to practical problems, the will of the legislator has been transformed and differentiated into a new form that is neither a two-sided structure between the traditional ¡°administrative agency - the people¡± nor a three-sided structure of administrative appeal, a new type of administrative procedure structure today.As a result of inductively observing and comparing various administrative procedures such as the Administrative Appeals Commission, the Disciplinary Commission, the Fair Trade Commission, the Korea Communications Commission, and the Financial Services Commission, the administrative procedure structure was largely divided into ¡°power distribution between administrative agencies¡± and ¡°power distribution between departments.¡±

[±¹³» ÇÐÀ§³í¹®]

ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÀÇ ÛöîÜЮð¤´Â ú¼ïÙíÂéÄÀÇ ÚÅñ«ûù ±×¸®°í Òö×ËûùµîÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. Áï ú¼ïÙï½ó­´Â Ûö×ȷΠЮïÒÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº Òö×ËûùÀÇ Ë­ðà¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÚÅñ«ûù°¡ öÕúªµÇ´Â °ÍÀ» ÛÁò­Çϱâ À§Çؼ­ÀÌ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ú¼ïÙݤÀÇ Ñ¦ÒöÀÌ üªÓ޵ʿ¡ µû¶ó í¡ÛöѦÒöµµ ¸¹¾ÆÁ³À¸¹Ç·Î ú¼ïÙí¡ÛöÀÇ ÷Öð¤â¢Ó«À¸·Î¼­ ú¼ïÙí¡Ûöï½ó­¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ð®ð¤°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ú¼ïÙí¡Ûöï½ó­´Â ú¼ïÙÀÇ Íëïáûù¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Òö×Ëûùµµ ÔÒãÁ¿¡ ðàûúÇÒ ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ´õ¿í ñìé©ÇÏ´Ù. ±×·±µ¥ ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ð¤Óø´Â ú¼ïÙí¡ÛöµîÀÇ ÞÀîñï½ó­´Â µîÇѽà µÇ°í, ú¼ïÙãû÷÷°ú °°Àº ÞÀý­ï½ó­°¡ ËÁܬÛö¿¡ ìéÝ»¸¸ÀÌ Ð®ïҵǾî ÀÖÀ» »ÓÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ÜâÒÕÙþÀº ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀÇ µµÀÔÀ» ð«äÐÇÏ°í ƯÈ÷ ЮöÎð¤ïÒï½ó­¸¦ º»¹Þ±â À§ÇÏ¿© ú¼ïÙí¡Ûöï½ó­¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© ìéÚõÛö°ú ËÁܬÛöÀ¸·Î ЮïÒÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â çÈ¡¤Ú¸ÛöÀ» ñéãýÀ¸·Î ÍÅóÌÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÜâÒÕÙþÀ» ÓÞÕÔ »ìÆ캸¸é, ð¯2íñ¿¡¼­´Â ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÀÇ ëòëù¿Í, ÛöîÜ Ð®ð¤ ±×¸®°í ê«×⸦ ÍÅóÌÇÏ¿© ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÀÇ ËÈκÀ» ÒÕâûÇÏ¿´´Ù. ð¯3íñ¿¡¼­´Â, çÈÏаú Ú¸ÏÐÀÇ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÀÇ Û¡Ó¹Î¦ïïÀ» »ìÆì º¸¾Ò´Â¹Ù, ìéÚõÛö°ú ËÁܬÛö¿¡¼­ÀÇ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÀÇ Ð®ïÒÀ» ÍÅóÌÇÏ¿´´Ù. ð¯4íñ¿¡¼­´Â, ú¼ïÙÀÌ Òö×Ëûùµµ ²ÒÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â ú¼ïÙí¡Ûöï½ó­¸¦ ÍÅóÌÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© êÍìòí¡ÛöÀÇ ÷Öð¤â¢Ó«À¸·Î¼­ÀÇ ï½ó­¸¦ çÈ¡¤Ú¸ÛöÀ» ñéãýÀ¸·Î »ìÆ캸¾Ò´Ù. ð¯5íñ¿¡¼­´Â ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ úÞú¼ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ð¤Óø¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æ º¸¾Ò´Â¹Ù, ñéÊà õ®äÐÀ» »ìÆì º¸¾Ò°í, ú¼ïÙï½ó­Ð®ïÒÀÇ Ùýð¹ïÇ ¹× ú°Ì½Û°äÐÀ» »ìÆ캸¾Æ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀÇ ð«äÐÀ» ÇÏ¿© º¸¾Ò´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ð¯6íñ Ì¿Öå¿¡¼­´Â ú¼ïÙï½ó­°¡ ÚÅñ«ûù¿Í Òö×ËàõÀ» ÜÁî¡À» ÙÍîÜÀ¸·Î Ûöð¤ûùµÇ¾î¾ß ÇϹǷΠƯÈ÷ í¡Ûöï½ó­°¡ Ë­ðàµÊÀ» ÀçÂ÷ åëÐàÇÏ¸ç ¾ÕÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ú¼ïÙï½ó­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ í¡ÛöÖåÀÇ î÷ËÒÛ°ú¾À» °Å·ÐÇÏ¿´´Ù.

[ÇØ¿Ü³í¹®]

The administrative procedure act of Taiwan was enacted in 1999, this law extensively refers to the Federal German administrative procedure act includes substantial legal regulations. Up to now this law has been revised five times, but there was only a tiny fraction of the law was been revised such as the executive ill-gotten gains refund litigation, administrative sanction, etc. This law had been challenged because of the limitation and practicability. The ministry of justice had received a new comprehensive amendment in 2016. The government department concerned is currently canvassing opinion. The Administrative Procedure Act of Korea is also lagging behind the new governance paradigm. With the development of artificial intelligent technology, administrative environment has changed already also. At present, the academia is reexamining the discussion that introducing substantive regulation of the Administrative Procedure Act in order to adapt to the changes. This article is based on such thinking, observing the results and trends after enacting Administrative Procedure Act in Taiwan. Through analysis legal issues, present situations and problems, provide clue to decide whether introduce legal system of administrative contracts or not.

[ÇØ¿Ü³í¹®]

The purpose of this study is to compare the administrative investigation system introduced by the revision of the Industrial Technology Protection Act. The Industrial Technology Protection Act requires the investigation of the actual conditions of Article 17 and the reporting of industrial technology violations in Article 15. However, Japan does not have individual laws such as Korea's Basic Law on Administrative Investigation. Japan's administrative investigations are conducted under individual laws. With regard to the investigation of the Industrial Technology Protection Act, this study seeks to study the administrative investigation system under the Japanese Antitrust Act.In order to ensure the appropriateness of the administrative investigation procedures, the Japan Fair Trade Commission (¡°JFTC¡±) provides standard steps and key points for the administrative investigation procedures based on the past practices into account. The guidelines specify what public officials should comply with when conducting an administrative investigation into cases that violate antitrust laws. Guidelines are issued to enhance the transparency of administrative investigation procedures and to help smooth implementation of administrative investigations.The JFTC¡¯s investigation procedures for alleged antitrust cases are classified into two categories : administrative investigation procedures and compulsory investigation procedures. The administrative investigation procedures is a procedures taken to investigate alleged antitrust cases potentially subject to administrative measure such as a cease and desist order, etc. and compulsory investigation procedures is a procedures taken to investigate alleged antitrust cases potentially subject to prosecution seeking criminal punishment. Of the above two procedures, the Guidelines are designed to cover the JFTC¡¯s administrative investigation procedures.If it is suspected that an act violating the Antimonopoly Act(the Act on Prohibition on Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade) is committed, the JFTC is authorized to investigate companies, etc., involved in an alleged violation and, in its administrative investigation procedures, take measures such as on-site inspection, order to submit documents, retention, order to appear and to be interrogated, order to report, based on the JFTC¡¯s authority with indirect enforcement which indirectly guarantee performance of investigation by punishment, while ensuring appropriateness of the procedures in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations in order to clarify whether the Antimonopoly Act is violated or not and to issue an order to take necessary measures to eliminate violations.In this paper, the administrative investigation procedures of the JFTC are studied. In this paper, specifically, the following points have been reviewed : the Guidelines of legal grounds, Explanation at the time of commencing On-site Inspection, Submission and retention of materials, Perusal and copy of submitted materials, Presence of an attorney during On-site Inspection, Procedures for interviews, Points to note in an interview, Length of interview and break times, Procedures for preparing records and affixing signatures and seals, Procedures for an order to report. For this examination, I would like to get a hint at the implementation of the administrative investigation into the Industrial Technology Research Act.

[±¹³» ÇÐÀ§³í¹®]

¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÇàÁ¤¹ýÀº ´ë·ú¹ýÀÇ ÀüÅëÀ» À̾î¹Þ¾Æ ÁÖ·Î ±× ½Çü¹ýÀû Ãø¸é, °á°ú·Î¼­ÀÇ ÇàÁ¤°áÁ¤¸¸À» Áß½ÃÇÏ°í ÇàÁ¤ÀÛ¿ëÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Â °úÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀº ¼ÒȦÈ÷ ÇØ¿Â °ÍÀÌ »ç½ÇÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Çö´ëº¹¸®±¹°¡¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ÇàÁ¤È°µ¿ÀÇ ¾çÀû¤ýÁúÀû È®´ëÇö»óÀÌ ÁøÀüµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ÇàÁ¤ÀÇ µ¿ÅÂÀûÀÎ °úÁ¤À» ÃÑÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î °í·ÁÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â ¹Ý¼ºÀÌ Æ¯È÷ ¹Ì±¹¿¡¼­ Àü°³µÈ ÇàÁ¤°úÁ¤·Ð°ú ´õºÒ¾î Á¦±âµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, »ç½Ç ´ë·ú¹ýÀû ÇàÁ¤¹ýÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¸ðµ¨ÀÎ µ¶ÀÏ ÇàÁ¤¹ý¿¡ À־µµ ±× ÀÌ·ÐÀû ¹ßÀüÀ» °¡´ÉÄÉ ÇÑ °áÁ¤Àû °è±â´Â ±âº»±ÇÀÇ ½ÇÈ¿Àû º¸Àå, °ø±Ç°³³äÀÇ È®´ë, ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀÇ Á¦Á¤ ¹× ÇàÁ¤ÀçÆÇÀ» ÅëÇÑ ±Ç¸®º¸È£ÀÇ È®ÃæÀ» ÅëÇØ ±¹°¡¿Í °³ÀÎ °£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¹ýÀû ÁÖü°£ÀÇ °ü°è·Î À籸¼ºÇÏ°í ³óÃà½ÃÄÑ¿Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù°í ÆǴܵȴÙ. ±×¸®°í ¿À´Ã³¯°ú °°Àº º¹Àâ´Ù±âÇÑ ÇàÁ¤Çö½Ç¿¡¼­´Â ¹«¾ùÀÌ ÃÖ¼±ÀÇ °áÁ¤Àΰ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ýÀû ÆǴܺ¸´Ù´Â ¾î¶°ÇÑ ³íÀÇ°úÁ¤À» °ÅÃÄ ÇÕ´çÇÑ °á·Ð¿¡ À̸¦ ¼ö Àִ°¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ýÀû º¸ÀåÀÌ ´õ Á߽õÇÁö ¾ÊÀ» ¼ö ¾ø´Ù°í ÇÏ°ÚÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ Á¡Àº Çö´ëÇàÁ¤ÀÇ °úÁ¦¸¦ ¼öÇàÇϱâ À§ÇØ Á¡Á¡ È®´ëµÇ¾î¿Â ÇàÁ¤Àç·®ÀÇ °æ¿ì ±× ÀýÂ÷Àû ÅëÁ¦ÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ °­Á¶µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â °Í¸¸À» º¸¾Æµµ ºÐ¸íÈ÷ µå·¯³­´Ù°í ÇÏ°Ú´Ù. ±Ù´ë¹ýÄ¡±¹°¡´Â ¹ý·ü¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀÇ ¿ø¸®¿¡ µû¶ó ÇàÁ¤±ÇÀÇ ¹ßµ¿À» ¹ý·ü¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© ÇàÇÏ¿©Áú °ÍÀ» ¿ä±¸Çϸ鼭 À§¹ý¤ýºÎ´çÇÑ ÇàÁ¤±ÇÇà»ç·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ±¹¹ÎÀÇ ±ÇÀÍÀÌ Ä§ÇØµÉ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÇàÁ¤°¨µ¶¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ½ÃÁ¤Çϰųª ±ÇÀͱ¸Á¦¸¦ À§ÇÑ »çÈÄÀû ºÒº¹¼ö´ÜÀ» ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °Í¸¸À¸·Î ¹ýÄ¡ÁÖÀÇ¿äûÀ» ÃæÁ·½ÃÅ°´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¹Ý¸é ÇàÁ¤ÀÛ¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ÀýÂ÷Àû ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ ÇàÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀº È¿À²ÀûÀÎ ÇàÁ¤¿î¿µ¿¡ ¿ªÇàÇϰųª ÁöÀåÀ» ÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ±¹¹ÎÀÇ ±âº»±Çº¸ÀåÀ» À̳äÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ½ÇÁúÀû ¹ýÄ¡±¹°¡¿¡ À־´Â ÇàÁ¤ÀÛ¿ëÀÌ Çü½ÄÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ý·ü¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÇàÇÏ¿©Áö´Â °Í¸¸À¸·Î´Â ¹ýÄ¡ÁÖÀÇ¿äûÀ» ÃæÁ·½ÃÅ°±â¿¡ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇÏ°Ô µÇ¸é¼­ ÇàÁ¤ÀÇ Àû¹ý¼º°ú °øÁ¤¼ºÀÇ È®º¸¸¦ À§ÇÑ »çÀüÀû ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ ¿ä±¸ÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ú´Ù. ¹ýÄ¡±¹°¡ÀÇ ÇàÁ¤¿µ¿ª¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¹ßÇö¿ø¸®ÀÎ ¹ýÄ¡ÇàÁ¤ÀÇ ¿ø¸®´Â ÀÚÀÇÀûÀÎ ÇàÁ¤À» ¹èÁ¦ÇÏ°í ÇàÁ¤ÀÌ ¹ýÀû ÀýÂ÷¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ̸ç, ¹ý·ü¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÀÇ ¿ø¸®»ó ÇàÁ¤ÇàÀ§¿¡ ½Çü¹ý»óÀÇ À§¹ý»çÀ¯°¡ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ±× À§¹ý¼ºÀº ´çÇØ ÇàÁ¤ÇàÀ§ÀÇ ¹«È¿ ¶Ç´Â Ãë¼Ò»çÀ¯°¡ µÇ´Â °ÍÀº ´ç¿¬ÇÏ´Ù. ¿µ¹Ì¹ý°è±¹°¡¿¡¼­´Â ºñ±³Àû °­ÇÑ ÀýÂ÷±ÔÁ¤À» ÅëÇØ ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷ÀÇ ±Ç¸®º¸È£±â´ÉÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇÏ·Á´Â °æÇâÀÌ Àִµ¥ ´ëÇÏ¿©, µ¶ÀÏ µî ´ë·ú¹ý°è±¹°¡¿¡¼­´Â ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀ» ½Çü¹ýÀÇ ½ÇÇöÀ» À§ÇÑ º¸Á¶¼ö´ÜÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇØÇÏ¿© ½Çü¹ýÀ» Áß½ÃÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÏ°Ú´Ù. ÀýÂ÷»óÀÇ ÇÏÀÚÀÇ Á¤µµ°¡ Áß´ëÇÏ°í ¸í¹éÇÑ °ÍÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÇÏÀÚÀÇ ÀϹݷп¡ µû¶ó ´çÇØ ÇàÁ¤ÇàÀ§´Â ¹«È¿ÀÎ ÇàÀ§°¡ µÈ´Ù°í ÇÏ°ÚÀ¸³ª, ±× ÀýÂ÷ÇÏÀÚ°¡ ÀÌ Á¤µµ¿¡ À̸£Áö ¾Æ´ÏÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Ãë¼ÒÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °Í¿¡ ±×Ä£´Ù°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ú´Ù. ÇàÁ¤ÇàÀ§´Â ±Ù°Å¹ýÀÌ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÑ ÁÖü, ³»¿ë, Çü½Ä ¹× ÀýÂ÷»óÀÇ ¿ä°ÇÀ» ¸ðµÎ ÃæÁ·ÇÏ¿© »ó´ë¹æ¿¡°Ô ÅëÁöµÊÀ¸·Î½á Àû¹ýÇÏ°Ô ¼º¸³¤ýÈ¿·ÂÀ» ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ´Ù¸¥ ¿ä°Ç°ú ´õºÒ¾î ÀýÂ÷»óÀÇ ¿ä°Ç¿¡ Èì°áÀÌ »ý±â¸é ÇàÁ¤ÇàÀ§ ÈìÀÇ ÀϹݷп¡ µû¶ó ¹«È¿ ¶Ç´Â Ãë¼ÒÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¿øÄ¢À̸ç, ƯÈ÷ ÇàÁ¤ÇàÀ§¿¡ ¿ä±¸µÇ´Â ÀýÂ÷´Â ÇàÁ¤ÀýÂ÷¹ýÀÇ ±ÔÀ²À» ¹Þ´Â »çÀüÅëÁö, û¹®, ÀÌÀ¯ºÎ±â µîÀÇ ÀýÂ÷°¡ ´ëºÎºÐ ±× ´ë»óÀÌ µÈ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÅëÁö, û¹® ¶Ç´Â ÀÌÀ¯ºÎ±âÀÇ ÀýÂ÷¿¡ À§¹ÝÇÑ ÇàÁ¤ÇàÀ§ÀÇ È¿·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®¤ý°ËÅäÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

[±¹³» ÇÐÀ§³í¹®]

ú¼ïÙÀÇ ÐÆÜâê«öÎ Áß¿¡¼­ ú¼ïÙï½ó­¿Í °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© Áß¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î´Â Ûö×È¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ú¼ïÙÀÇ ê«öÎ ³»Áö Ûö×ÈÀÇ ò¨ÛÕ(Herrschaft des Gesetzes) ê«öΰú ÚÅñ«ú¼ïÙÀÇ ê«öÎÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÷åÈ÷ úÞÓÛÜØ××ÏÐÊ«ÀÇ Ñ¦ÒöâÄú¼°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§, ³¯·Î ÎÆæ´ûù ¡¤ ÒýåÆûù ¡¤ êüÔÑûùÇÏ´Â ú¼ïÙíÂéÄ¿¡ À־ Ûöö½ñ«ëù ³»Áö ÚÅñ«ú¼ïÙÀÇ ê«öÎÀº ±× êËѦ¿¡ ïÈÇÏÁö ¾Æ´ÏÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾úÀ¸´Ï, ÀÌÀÇ ÁÖµÈ ê«ì×À¸·Î´Â ú¼ïÙÀÇ í»ë¦ìµÖå,Òö×Ëú¼ïÙÀ» Ãß±¸Çϴ ίÖöñ«ëùÀÇ Û¢ûÃ, ÝÕü¬ïÒËÈÒ· ¹× ÷Öö½ú¼êÓ µîÀ¸·Î ºÒ¸®¿ì´Â áÃèâçÐæ´ÀÇ ÔôíÞÀ» µé ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¸°Ô ÝþÓÞÇØÁö´Â ú¼ïÙ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ú¼ïÙËÔô÷·Î¼­ÀÇ ÏÐÚÅÀÇ ò¢êÈ´Â ±× ÏíìÌöÕúªÀÇ Ê¦ÒöàõÀ» ´õ¿í ´õ °®°Ô µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ öÕúª´Â èÇà÷µÈ ÞÀãù(vollendete Tatsache)·Î µÇ¾î, ÀÌÀÇ Ï­ð­´Â ãùô÷ÛöÀÇ Ñ¦ÒöÀ̳ª ÞÉÛöï½ó­¸¸À» ÅëÇÏ¿©¼­´Â ÜÁî¡µÉ ¼ö ¾ø°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÏÐÚÅÏíìÌÀÇ ãùüùîÜϭ𭸦 À§ÇÏ¿© Ïí×׶õ ͳïÒµÈ °ÍÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ Î¦ïïÀ» °ÅÃļ­ ãùú޵ȴٴ °Í¿¡¼­ ëòëù¸¦ ã¾Æ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â ìããÛ(Verfahrensgarantien)ÀÌ ±í¾îÁö´Â µî ï½ó­¸¦ ñìãÊÇÏ´Â ù¦ðÍ°¡ ´ëµÎµÇ±â¿¡ À̸£·¶´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °æÇâ¿¡ µû¶ó ±¹¹ÎÀÇ ÏíìÌÀ» ħÇØÇÏ´Â ú¼ïÙíÂéÄÀ» ÇàÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ±× ì¦úªÎ¼ÌõìѵéÀÇ ï½ó­îÜ ÞÀîñóÑæ¨ÀÇ ù±é©àõÀÌ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ°í, ±×°ÍÀº ÀýÂ÷Àû±âº»±Ç(Verfahrensgrundrecht)À¸·Î±îÁö ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏ·Á´Â °æÇâ¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. û¡ãÒîÜÛöö½ñ«ëùÀÇ ¿ø¸®°¡ Áö¹èµÈ´ø ÓÞ×ÁÛöͧÏÐÊ«¿¡ À־ ÏíÕôú¼ïÙ ñéãýÀÇ ÇàÁ¤ÀûÀÌ·ÐÀÌ Àü°³µÇ°í ¹ýÄ¡ÁÖÀÇ ±× ÀÚü¸¦ ÞÀý­îÜÀÎ ÏíìÌÏ­ð­â¢Ó«ÀÇ Á¦µµÀû ¸¶·ÃÀ¸·Î ÃæºÐÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¾Ò±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ï½ó­îÜЮëÏÀº °ü½ÉÀÇ ´ë»ó ¹ÛÀ̾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ß¾âûÇÑ ï½ó­ñìãÊù¦ðÍ¿Í °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© 1925³â ¿À½ºÆ®¸®¾Æ ìéÚõú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀÇ ã¿ú¼ ì¤ý­¿¡ à¤Ô¼¿¡¼­µµ 1977³â ºÎÅÍ æáÛÀú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀÌ ã¿ú¼µÇ±â¿¡ À̸£·¶´Ù. ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡ À־µµ ú¼ïÙÀÇ ï½ó­îÜЮëÏ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀº 1960³â´ë ÀÌÈĺÎÅÍ Àϱ⠽ÃÀÛÇÏ¿© ¸¹Àº æÚϼ¿Í Ò½Õô ³¡¿¡ 1987³â 7¿ù¿¡ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöäÐÀÌ í¡ÛöçãͱµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â àâïÒÀ̸ç, ÜâÍÿ¡¼­´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀÇ ð¤ïÒ°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿©, ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ ú¼ïÙÀÇ úÞãùÀ» ãùñûîÜÀ¸·Î ÍÅóÌÇÏ¿´´Ù. ú¼ïÙï½ó­(Administrative Procedure)ÀÇ ¸é¿¡¼­ ú¼ïÙÀÇ Ð®ëÏÀº ð¤Óø í»ô÷´Â Ú¨Öå ±× ê¡éÄ ¸é¿¡¼­µµ ¸Å¿ì Þª÷ÖìéîÜÀ̸ç, ÞªãùüùîÜÀ̶ó´Â °ÍÀ» ÍÅóÌÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ̸ۡÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ð³Ùýð¹ïÇÀ» кÜ×Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿©´Â úÞú¼ ï½ó­Ð®ïÒÀÇ ÜÍèÇÀ̳ª ëºúþܬ·Î ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀ» ð¤ïÒÇÏ´Â Û°äÐÀ» »ý°¢ÇÒ¼ö°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª, À̺¸´Ù´Â ÷ÖìéîÜÀÎ ú¼ïÙï·óªÛöîðÀ» ¸¶·ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ º¸ÀÚ ´õ ãùüùîÜÀ̶ó°í »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ´Ù¸¸ ú¼ïÙï½ó­ÛöÀº ãùô÷ÛöÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï°í ï½ó­ÛöÀ¸¹Ç·Î ±× ЮïÒµéÀÌ ÐüâúîÜÀ̾î¾ß Çϸç, ÚÅÞÀáÍáèï½ó­¿Í °°ÀÌ ¾ö°ÝÇÏÁö´Â ¾Ê´õ¶óµµ ±× ï½ó­Î¡ïïÀ» º¸´Ù ßÙá¬ÇÏ°í Ù¥ü¬ÇÏ°Ô Ð®ïÒÇÏ¿© ±× ãùüùàõÀ» Ó½ÜÁÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù¸é Çѳ¯ àÔåëîÜÀÎ üùÍý¹Û¿¡ ¾ø´Â íûãÞîÜÛö×È·Î ï®ÕªÇÏ°ÔµÉ êËúÏÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù´Â úÞãùÀ» òÁãÊÇÏ°í, ¿ì¸®ÀÇ Ûö×ÈÙþûù¿Í ú¼ïÙæ¨Ëì¿¡ ݬùêÇÏ´Â Ò®é»ÀÌ µÇ¾î¾ß Çϸç, à»òäú¼ïÙï½ó­ð¤ÓøÀÇ ¼±º°Àû µµÀÔÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© ãùôÂʦÒöÇÑ ÝÂ寺ÎÅÍ ð¤ÓøûùÇÔÀÌ öæÓ×ÇÏ´Ù.

[±¹³» ÇÐÀ§³í¹®]

/ 287

Filters

º¸±âÇü½Ä

Á¤·Ä¼ø¼­

Æ÷¸Ë

¸®½ºÆ® ¼ö