[국내논문]

[국내 학위논문]

일반적으로 國際去來紛爭에 있어서는 當事者의 國籍이 다르기 때문에 當事者에 의한 自治的 分爭解決手段인 仲裁가 널리 이용되고 있다. 仲裁는 訴訟에 비하여 뛰어난 效率性을 가지고 있으며, 따라서 효율성을 중시하는 國際商去來에 있어서는 거의 유일한 解決制度라고 해도 과언은 아니다. 따라서 國際商事仲裁는 국제거래를 하는 當事者에게는 그 必要性이 認識되어, 선진제국에서는 일찍부터 발달하여 왔다. 그러나 國際商事仲裁가 그 機能을 발휘하기 위해서는 각국의 仲裁制鹿와는 별개의 국제적인 統一된 仲裁法制가 필연적으로 要請된다. 이에 國際的으로 그 통일化를 위한 努力이 꾸준히 推進되었으며, 그 成果物로는 1958년의 뉴욕협약, 1965년의 워싱턴협약, 1976년의 UNCITRAL仲裁規則, 그리고 1985년의 國際聯合 標準仲裁法을 들 수 있다. 특히 標準仲裁法은 이제까지의 國際商事仲裁에 관한 統一努力이 集約된 것으로서 그 영향이 크다. 일찌기 仲裁制度가 발달한 선진각국도 기존의 自國의 仲裁制度를 標準仲裁法의 趣旨에 따라 改正 및 補完하는 作業이 활발하다. 본 論文은 이러한 國際商事仲裁制度에 관한 세계적 추세에 따라 우리나라 國際商事仲裁制度에 관한 問題點과 그 改善方案을 提示하려고 한다. 이를 위하여 먼저 國際商事仲裁制度의 本質과 그 特徵 및 각국의 仲裁制度에서 나타나는 특징과 주요 國際條約의 內容과 性格을 알아보았다. 다음으로 우리나라의 仲裁制度가 가지는 特徵과 현재의 우리 國際去來에서의 仲裁制度에 대한 현황을 분석하여, 國際商事去來에 있어서의 仲栽의 必要性을 實證的으로 살피고, 그 問題點을 고찰하였다. 끝으로 문제점에 대한 분석을 통하여 우리나라 仲裁制度에 대한 改善方案을 仲裁成立, 仲裁節次, 仲裁判定의 세 부분으로 나누어 고찰하였다. 결론적으로 본 논문은 우리나라 國際商事仲裁制度가 가지는 問題點과 그 改善方案을 통하여 한국 國際商事仲裁制度의 國際性과 效率性을 提高시키고 國際商事紛爭解決을 위한 仲裁制度의 統一的인 基準을 提示하려고 하였다.

[국내논문]

A legal policy of arbitration should aim to regulate the application of international standards which are developing in an increasingly complex fashion. As the administering of arbitration cases is characterized by the gradual recognition of general standards in relation to international commercial arbitration procedure. International commercial arbitration has progressively become an autonomous discipline at the heart of the law and practices of international trade. The ICC International Court of Arbitration contributes usefully to the security and expansion of world trade. The principle of party autonomy enables the parties to an arbitration to design their arbitral proceedings to suit their particular needs. With regard to the law governing arbitral procedure, this principle grants the parties the power to select suitable procedural rules. Parties to a commercial agreement do not always exercise their right to expressly determine their own choice of law. This factor led to the development of the theory of implied choice of law whereby certain actions of the parties are deemed to manifest an intention to have their agreement regulated by a particular national law. According to this theory, the parties" intention regarding their choice of law could, in some instances, be reasonably inferred from their contractual document. International commercial arbitration involve the levels of Law: the law applicable to the arbitration agreement, which regulates the obligation of the parties to settle the dispute by arbitration. The law applicable to the reference, which governs the individual reference to arbitration. The law applicable to the arbitration proceedings, which regulates the conduct of the arbitration proceedings. The law applicable to the substance of the dispute, which determines the rights and obligation of the parties in relation to their substantive contract. General principles of conflicts of laws is based on the presumption that certain principles of conflict of laws are common to the world community, or at any rate to a majority of them. It is thus premised on the possibility of common principles from national conflict rules. There is no doubt that if there are indeed such principles that are generally accepted, they should be applied by arbitrators not only because their application would be deemed to be within the expectations of the parties, but also because their general acceptance argues the case for their application in international commercial arbitration.

[국내 학위논문]

본 논문은 중국의 국제상사중재제도에 대한 소개를 통하여 중국에서 이루어지는 국제상사중재와 중국에서의 외국 중재판정의 승인 및 집행에 관하여 살펴보았다. 이와 같은 연구를 하게 된 이유는 중재 제도 자체가 소송대체분쟁해결방법(ADR)으로 각 나라에서 많이 이용되고 있고 중국이라는 특정된 나라를 선택한데는 대외개방정책으로 인해 외국과의 경제거래가 활발하게 진행되고 있다. 특히 한국과 중국은 지리적으로 상접하고 경제발전에서 서로 보완가능 등 이유에서 경제거래가 급부상하고 있는데 이러한 현실에 비추어 불가피하게 경제분쟁도 많이 발생하고 있다. 이러한 배경을 전제로 중국의 국제상사제도를 소개함으로 중국 파트너와 분쟁이 발생하였을 경우 중국의 국제상사중재제도에 대한 사전의 이해는 현실성이 있는 것이기 때문이다. 본 논문의 각 장의 내용을 살펴보면 다음과 같다. 우선 본론적인 검토 및 비교를 하기에 앞서 중국의 국제상사중재에 대한 전반적인 이해를 돕기 위하여 관련 개념정리와 발전 역사를 살펴보았다. 이어서 제3장에서는 중국에서 진행되는 국제상사중재 제도의 흐름을 살펴보는 맥락에서 그 진행에 대하여 상세하게 설명하였다. 제4장에서는 외국의 중재판정의 승인 및 집행의 절차, 현황, 문제점 등을 검토하였다. 중국은 활발하게 진행되고 있는 법제도 건설과 함께 법률 자체가 실시간으로 사법해석, 개정작업 등 형식으로 빠르게 변화하고 있으므로 본 논문의 짧은 편폭에서 완전하게 다루는 것은 무리일 수 있으나 대략적인 흐름을 제시함으로 현재의 제도를 이해하고 나아가 이러한 맥락에서 앞으로의 발전추세를 짚어보는데 그 의의를 두었다.

[국내논문]

The reorganization of the global economy since the collapse of the East European bloc has spurred a global trend toward the internationalization of politics. cultures. and economics. North Korea has not been immune from this trend and has taken drastic measures intended to improve its domestic economy. as well as its international economic presence. In addition. these measures are aimed at improving the standard of living in North Korea as well as making the North Korean market more attractive to foreign investors. In 1991, North Korea"s government proclaimed the Raiin-Sonbong area a Free Economic and Trade Zone. In 1992. the government initiated economic trade relations with South Korea. and in 2002, they introduced a "Hong Kong-type" special zone in Sinuiju City. Other measures include the revision of its Constitution and the amendment of numerous foreign business related laws. In spite of these efforts. however. foreign capital still has not materialized within North Korea. Among the reasons for this predicament is the lack of clear and understandable mechanisms to settle business disputes. North Korea does not publish a complete collection of its official laws so it is difficult for foreigners to fully understand North Korea"s legal system. This makes it difficult for commercial enterprises to conduct business let alone settle disputes. However. this predicament has changed since the Constitutional revision of 1998. Rules were made clearer for North Koreans and foreign investment enterprises. and one year later. the North Korean government established the External Economic Arbitration Law ("EEAL"). The EEAL was aimed at stimulating business transactions between itself and foreign enterprisesby adding certainty to the dispute resolution process in a cost effective manner. Moreover. the EEAL seeks to confirm the commitment of the North Korean government to its other international business law obligations. The purpose of this essay is to contribute to the little commentary about North Korean commercial arbitration and the EEAL. Therefore. I survey the EEAL"s provisions, its effect on international disputes. and examine problems that may stem from this law. I also make recommendations for improving the EEAL where applicable.

[국내논문]

[국내논문]

It is almost necessary that the trade claims are arisen by the parties concerned in performing international trade. So it is a serious matter for those who perform the international trade to settle the international commercial dispute. There are many ways to settle such international commercial dispute, but above all, to make the most of international commercial arbitration system is most rational and efficient for settling the dispute. So I studied about the international commercial arbitral award that seems to be the most important in performing the international trade. For this purpose, wrote an introductory remarks as a way of bringing in the point at issue in the first chapter. In chapter Ⅱ, studied about the general matters in the international commercial arbitration and arbitral award, such as the characteristics of the international commercial arbitration system, the definition and kinds of the arbitral award, the rights, liabilities and responsibilities of the arbitrators, the process of commercial arbitration and the present situation of the international commercial arbitration in Korea. In chapter Ⅲ, examined about the legal aspects of the international commercial arbitration awards by referring to the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the Arbitration Rules of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law(UNCITRAL), Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Uniform Arbitration Act of United States of America, Arbitration Rilles of the Commercial Arbitration and Mediation Center for the Americas(CAMCA), Arbitration Act of United Kingdom, the Code of Civil Procedure of Germany, the Code of Civil Procedure of France, the Code of Civil Procedure of Japan and the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the Japanese Commercial Arbitration Association, the Arbitration Law of Korea and the Arbitration Rules of the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board. And finally, summed up this study and singled out the conclusion in chapter Ⅳ.

[국내 학위논문]

[국내논문]

While doing business in China foreign companies occasionally find themselves embroiled in disputes with Chinese individuals, companies or the Chinese Government. There are three primary ways to resolve a commercial dispute in China are negotiation, arbitration and litigation. The best way of dispute resolution is negotiation as it is the least expensive method and the working relationship of both parties concerned in dispute. But negotiations do not always give rise to resolution. Arbitration is the next choice. Unless the parties concerned can agree to resort to arbitration after the dispute has arisen, the underlying contract namely, sales contract or separate agreement must show that disputes will be resolved by arbitration. Agreements to arbitration specify arbitration body and governing law. There are two Chinese government -sponsored arbitration bodies for handling cases involving at least one foreign party: China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) and China Maritime Arbitration Commission(CMAC) for maritime disputes. Contracts regarding foreign companies doing business in China often designate CIETAC arbitration. CIETAC distinguishes between two kinds of dispute resolutions, foreign-related arbitration and domestic arbitration. For a dispute to be classified as foreign-related arbitration, one of the companies must be a foreign entity without a major production facility or investment in China. CIETAC has published rules which govern the selection of a panel if the contract does not specify how the choice of arbitration will be handled. CIETAC's list of arbitrators for foreign-related disputes, from which CIETAC's arbitrators must en chosen, includes may non-Chines arbitrators. But many foreign experts believe that some aspects of CIETAC needs to be improved. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of arbitration in China, CIETAC by way of studying the current situation and improvement of international commercial arbitration in China.

[국내논문]

At its thirty-second session in 1999, the UNCITRAL had before it the requested note entitled 'Possible future work in the area of international commercial arbitration.' After concluding the discussion on its future work in the area of international commercial arbitration, it was agreed that the priority items for the working group should be conciliation, requirement of written form for the arbitration and enforceability of interim measures of protection. the Commission entrusted the work to the Working Group on Arbitration which held its thirty-second session at Vienna from 20 to 31 March 2000. The Working Group discussed agenda item 3 on the basis of the report of Secretary General entitled 'Possible uniform rules on certain issues concerning settlement of commercial disputes : conciliation, interim measures of protection, written form for arbitration agreement.' At its thirty-three session in 2000, the UNCITRAL had before it the report of Secretary General on agenda item 3 discussed by the Working Group. The Working Group discussed the issues relating to certain aspects of conciliation proceedings ; (1) Admissibility of certain evidence in subsequent judicial or arbitral proceedings ; (2) Role of conciliatior in arbitration or court proceedings ; (3) Enforceability of settlement agreements reached in conciliation proceedings ; (4) Other possible items for harmonized treatment : a) Admissibility or desirability of conciliation by arbitrators b) Effect of an agreement to conciliate on judicial or arbitral proceedings c) Effect of conciliation on the running of limitation period d) Communication between the conciliator and parties ; disclosure of information e) Role of conciliator. It was generally considered that decisions as to the form of the text to be prepared should be made at a later stage when the substance of prepared solutions would become clearer. However, it was noted that model legislative provisions seemed to be appropriate form for a number of matters proposed to be discussed in the area conciliation. There was general support in the Working Group for the proposition to perpare a legislative regime governing the enforcement of interim measures of protection ordered by arbitral tribunals. It was generally considered that legislative regime should apply to enforcement of interim measures issued in arbitration taking place in State where enforcement was sought as well as outside that State. It was generally observed that there was a need for provisions which conformed to current practice in international trade with regard to requirements of written form for arbitration agreement. The view was adopted by the Working Group that the objective of ensuring a uniform interpretation of the form requirement that responded to the needs of international trade could be achieved by : preparing a model legislative provision clarifying, for avoidance of doubt, the scope of article 7(2) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration : and adopting a declaration, resolution or statement addressing the interpretation of the New York Convention that would reflect a broad understanding of the form requirement. There was general agreement in the Working Group that, in order to promote the use of electronic commerce for international trade and leave the parties free to agree to the use of arbitration in the electronic commerce sphere, article II(2) of the New York Convention should be interpreted to cover the use of electronic means of communication as defined un article 2 of the Model Law on Electronic Commerce and that it required no amendment to do that. The UNCITRAL may wish to consider to the desirability of preparing uniform provisions on any of those issues concerning conciliation and arbitration proceedings, possibly indicating whether future work should be towards a legislative text or non-legislative text.

[국내 학위논문]

[국내논문]

[국내 학위논문]

오늘날 세계경제는 여러 가지 형식으로 글로벌화 되고 있다. 그 결과 국가와 지역적인 한계를 벗어나 경제교류가 활발해지고 세계무역조직도 끊임없이 나타나고 있다. 한중 양국은 무역구조에 상호보완성이 있어 그 것을 바탕으로 국교수립 이후 경제교류가 급속히 확대되어 가고 있다. 그 결과 중국은 한국의 제1 투자대상국으로, 한편 한국은 중국의 대규모 수출 대상국으로 부상되었다. 현재 한중 두 나라는 FTA체결을 위해 노력하고 있으며, 이러한 FTA가 체결되면 양국의 무역관계는 새로운 발전단계에 진입할 것이다. 그러나 한중 양국 간의 경제협력이 확대되는 한편으로 교역 및 투자관련 분쟁도 급격하게 증가하고 있다. 한중간의 무역 분쟁은 언어, 법 개념, 상관습 등의 차이에서 오는 것이 대부분이고, 또한 상대에 대한 무지에서 발생하는 무역 분쟁도 상당히 많다. 따라서 이러한 무역 분쟁의 원만한 처리가 현안으로 부상하게 되었다. 무역 분쟁을 해결하는 방법에는 여러 가지가 있는데, 그 중의 하나가 중재이다. 중재는 세계무역거래 있어서 효율적인 분쟁해결방식으로 갈수록 많이 활용되고 있다. 본 논문은 한국과 중국 간의 무역거래에 있어서 분쟁발생시 이용할 수 있는 분쟁해결제도의 하나인 상사중재제도에 관하여 한중 양국 중재제도의 차이점과 문제점을 중심으로 연구하였다. 양국의 중재제도에 대한 비교연구의 결과로서의 차이점을 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째 중국은 중재합의의 내용에 대하여 자세하게 규정하고 있다. 둘째 한국은 중재인의 자격에 관하여 구체적인 규정을 두고 있지 않으나 중국은 중재인의 자격을 엄격하게 규정하고 있다. 셋째 중재판정부의 구성과 관련하여 한국은 원칙적으로 1인의 중재인으로 하고 있으나 중국은 원칙적으로 3인으로 한다. 또한 한국의 경우는 누구나 중재인으로 선임할 수 있으나 중국은 원칙적으로 중재기구가 제시한 중재인 명부에서 선임하여야 한다. 넷째 한국의 경우 중재판정은 원칙적으로 심리종결일로부터 45일 이내에 하여야 하지만, 중국의 경우는 중재판정부 구성일로부터 6개월 이내에 중재판정을 내려야 한다, 한편 한중 양국의 중재제도에 존재하는 문제점과 그 개선방안을 제시하면 다음과 같다. 우선 한국의 경우 중재규칙이 기존규칙과 새로 제정한 국제규칙 두 종류가 있어 혼란의 여지가 있고, 또 국제규칙상으로 중립적이고 전문성 있는 중재인 선정을 담보하는 기구가 없는 점 등의 문제가 있다. 따라서 당사자 간에 명시적인 합의가 없는 경우에 어느 규칙이 적용되는가를 정하는 규정을 도입하고, 또한 객관성과 투명성을 갖춘 대한상사중재원의 내부 기구가 중재인을 선정하도록 하기 위한 제도적 장치를 마련할 필요가 있다. 그리고 중국의 경우 우선 존재할 여지가 없는 임의중재를 수용하는 방향으로 중재법을 개정할 필요가 있다. 둘째 중재기구가 명실 공히 정부의 간섭으로부터 완전히 벗어나는 독립적인 기구가 될 수 있는 제도적인 장치가 마련되어야 할 것이다. 셋째 중재합의에 대하여 그 내용에서부터 형식에 이르기까지 상당히 자세하게 규정하고 있는 중재법을 개정하여 국제적으로 통용되는 방법과 같이 『중재신청의 의사표시』만을 중재합의 필수요건으로 하고 중재사항이나 중재위원회의 선정 등은 필수요건에서 제외시켜야 한다. 넷째 지나치게 엄격하게 규정하고 있는 중재인의 자격요건을 완화하고, 중재인명부 이외에서도 당사자들이 자유롭게 중재인을 선임할 수 있도록 하는 제도의 정비가 필요하다. 마지막으로 불합리한 최고인민법원에 대한 보고제도를 개선하고, 장기적으로는 이러한 제도를 폐지시켜 나가야 할 것이다. 그런데 현실적으로 중국의 국제상사중재제도가 안고 있는 문제점은 가까운 시일 내에 개선되기 어렵다. 따라서 중국에 진출하거나 중국과 교역을 하고자 하는 기업들은 이상에서 살펴 본 양국 중재제도의 차이점과 각국의 문제점을 충분히 이해하고, 분쟁발생시 효율적으로 중재제도를 활용할 수 있도록 하여야 할 것이다.

[국내 학위논문]

China is the largest market for goods and investments to South Korean companies as well sa foreign companies and the transactions between South Korea and China are expected to increase. When a dispute broke in China , foreign companies, including Korean companies in China are facing many difficulties. And this kind of dispute tends to increase with the increase of transactions. International commercial disputes because a lot of restrictions follow suit in the country's courts to resolve the situation to resolve by arbitration re - introduction authorized by the UN Convention. Following the Foreign Trade Arbitration Commission for arbitration procedure to install the Commission to establish temporary rules. Most of the positions arbitration in accordance with the addresses of the parties domestic arbitration and international classified as intervention to proceed with the arbitration proceedings as of this party in China in the Chinese territory in a country that is, the domestic mediation and negotiation, depending on whether the residence castle Arbitration (International Arbitration) distinguished by conducting an arbitration procedure, but that does not seem worthy of international trust so far in the last 30 years in international transactions or disputes often. Therefore, authors in China has led to the largest international trade in the global village, but disputes arising from international trade are such that solving the drunk easy to see that the situation is leaking and the title part that created difficult by the procedure, depending on the intervention agencies of foreign countries By concentrating on reliability issues with the lack of mediation and arbitration procedures and institutions in China to study. Especially effective issue for the pre-arbitration settlement and post-arbitration agreement based on the contents of Arbitration of China pose a mediation process, selected problems of the arbitrator, national or compared to international standards with respect and recognition and enforcement issues in the court for the court of a foreign its relevance to the problem together and analyzed the arbitration institution in China to Southeast Asian countries, as well as continued contributes most trusted arbitration institution in the global village has a purpose of the present study. This study consists of five chapters , Content of each chapter is as follows . Chapter 1 is the introduction of this study. In chapter 1 pbjective, method and scope of research were described. Chapter 2 Analysis development process and the status of China arbitration system, the organization and the way they operate China arbitration institutions Chapter 3 By analyzing Features and arbitration cases summarized China Arbitration System question China's arbitration system Chapter 4 Through the above to find arbitration System problem and cietac arbitration procedures of the organization, and show improvement program Chapter 5 Summarized this thesis and made a conclusion

[국내 학위논문]

[해외논문]

This article seeks to review the international commercial courts that are being established around the world and to assess their potential relationship with the international investment court system being pursued by the EU and others. It seeks to analyze the future and prospects of international commercial courts upon the international dispute resolution system, particularly in comparison with the prevailing system of international arbitration and also the investment court system. The borders between litigation by courts and arbitration by arbitral tribunal continue to become less clear. Overall, international commercial courts should be considered as adding to the ecosystem of international dispute resolution rather than competing with other traditional forms such as international arbitration. New forms of international commercial courts may continue to evolve to expand beyond their current jurisdictional boundaries to possibly have an impact on the investment court system.

[국내논문]

Since the Start of WTO in 1995, world trade volume was substantially increased as much as over $250 billion by lifting the trade barriors This effect brought new problem of increasing disputes. Significantly an ever increasing atention is paid to the Question of means and procedures of settling such disputes by arbtration. The problem of arbitration has indeed become most popular with all those who take interest in legal aspects of international cooperation in various spheres. In practice arbitration seems to renovate its function to take over new disputes arising from electronic transaction such as internet trade. Looking at the actual use of arbitration, its merits than litigation should cover new aspect concerning new kind of claims caused by new type of transaction. The efficient procedure for dispute will help every country save loss of profit by the delay of settlment. This thesis aims to facilitate the appearence of more efficient arbitration procedure for dispute settlment system.

[국내논문]

[국내논문]

본고는 동남아시아 국가 가운데에서도 경제성장잠재력과 발전가능성에서 두각을 나타내고 있는 국가로서 베트남사회주의공화국에 관하여 살펴보고 있다. 무역과 투자에 관한 통계지표를 살펴볼 경우에도 우리나라의 대표적인 무역 및 투자국가 순위를 차지하고 있는 베트남과의 관계를 살펴보면서 특히 국제상거래에서의 상사분쟁의 해결에 관한 중재제도를 살펴보고 있다. 베트남의 상사중재법이 제정된 시기가 10여년에 불과하기에 국제상사중재제도에서 나타나는 국제적 경향과 추세와 비교하여 여전한 문제를 안고 있는 베트남의 중재제도를 직시하고자 한다. 이를 살펴 베트남과의 상사분쟁해결을 위한 중재제도의 제도적 특성과 함께 주요 법제에 대한 이해를 도모함과 아울러 사회주의공화국으로서 베트남의 정치경제적 성격을 고려한 분쟁해결에서의 상사중재제도의 국제적 성격과 구별되는 한계와 그 대안을 모색해 봄으로써 우리나라와 베트남의 동반경제성장과 발전을 위한 분쟁해결제도에서의 이해를 도모하고자 한다.

[국내논문]

[국내논문]

[국내 학위논문]

[국내논문]

[국내 학위논문]

[국내논문]

[국내논문]

Arbitration plays a most important role in international trade today. The System of Korean International Commercial Arbitration is to be governed by the Arbitration Law and the Arbitration Rules of KCAB newly changed. A number of questions against controvertible issues which are not expressly stipulated in the Law and Rules may be arisen in practice. The aims of this study are to answer the questions, and then to make criterions of interpretation on them clear under the methods of research adapted here.

[국내논문]

Cross border transaction have brought needs for search and comparisons on dispute resolution and the judicial systems about the development countries. Indonesia among the south east Asian Countries is expected to be a brightist economic nation potentially.Arbitration in Indonesia is governed by the arbitration law which came into force on 1999. And the rules of BANI, the Indodesian national bard of arbitration have been revised more close to the standard rules for international commercial disputes systems in 2020 which is the result of many draft and revisions a number of different sources. It looks around the similarity in arbitral principles and practional dispute resolutions systems deal broadly on dispute resolution mechanism and judicial laws available and the BANI arbitration institute on the international commercial arbitration on the Indonesian arbitrational laws and rules. However there are lots of differences articles of the law on the binding opinion by an arbitration institution or the contain elements in the valuable arbitration award for a heading words based on belief in the Almighty God, compare Indonesia Arbitration Law with the provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Arbtration and the arbitral laws of foreign countries.The purpose in this paper is to make good opportunities for increasing economic scope and volume of business relationships with Indonesia based on the problems and alternatives in the international commercial dispute resolution systems.

[국내 학위논문]

[국내 학위논문]

Economic exchange of Korea and China has shown steady increase and made drastic advancement. However, due to difference in languages, customs, legalities and etc between the countries, there are frequent cases of having various conflicts between parties. Because of insufficient prior knowledge and lack of experience on dispute resolution plans, there are many cases where prompt and accurate response plans are unavailable to solve issues. This is attributable to the fact that the trade volume has been expanded with diversified trade types between Korea and China in recent days, as well as having even more complex causes and tendencies in trade disputes thereof. Under the situation, this study has aimed at analyzing the causes of trade disputes and solution plan for businesses with the focus on export and import transactions of Korea and China and preventing disputes that may occur in trade transactions as well as systematically managing trade claims for companies of both countries. And, it has also purported to come up with plans to efficiently encounter with conditions and disputes to place importance in trade transactions for businesses in both countries.
 In order to break away from transactional dispute of countries or minimize such a dispute, it is important to seek for preventive measures in advance. It is important to acquire advance knowledge and careful advance investigation on credibility. In addition, make sure to prepare the trade contract to prepare for possible future claims. When preparing the contract, careful attention has to be paid on the basis of professional knowledge on pertinent conditions on transactions in a way of preventing any trade dispute from lack of understanding on terms and conditions of the contract. In addition, the arbitration provision pertinent to the dispute should be inserted on the trade contract and the stipulation on the resolution plan on dispute in details should be made. There is a dear need to establish and implementation for pertinent preventive measures, such as, fully undertaking quality control that is usually the cause of disputes. For this purpose, it requires advancement of professionals on trade dispute and continuous education on working level personnel in trade.
 In trading with China, more than anything else, parties to transactions should fully understand the arbitration provisions of China and Korea and apply such provision well. However, they do not fully aware on the system and arbitration system of China, a socialist country, and because of this, wrong decisions have been made. In addition, when entering into the arbitration contract, it has to consider the case for arbitration and litigation to cause difficulty of preparing accurate contract phrases on the contract seriously that there are many cases of having adverse interests in arbitration and litigation.
 When preparing the contract, a third-party arbitrator is required to select on the arbitration provision, each party shall select one arbitrator at the time of preparing the stipulation on the arbitration provision for trade transaction with arbitrating country, and the two selected arbitrators are selected with third party arbitrator, but the arbitration is enticed to hold in Korea to minimize the complaints of parties and the arbitration should be made in more advantageous position than having the commercial disputes.
 In addition, by selecting the arbitration provision depending on the position of the contract, the contents of contracts that Korean companies consider lightly and neglect easily should be inserted with arbitration provisions following the position of the contract. In particular, the arbitration provision of the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board(KCAB) is inserted in the contract to prevent having the arbitration in China where there is no authority to say for arbitrator selection and excluding the ambiguous or unrealized arbitration provision in a way of minimizing the possibility not to have the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) not to handle cases due to ambiguous contents of the arbitration provisions that it would be wise method to minimize the difficulties and unfairness from the commercial disputes at a later time.

[국내논문]

This article seeks to review the international commercial courts that are being established around the world and to assess their potential relationship with the international investment court system being pursued by the EU and others. It seeks to analyze the future and prospects of international commercial courts upon the international dispute resolution system, particularly in comparison with the prevailing system of international arbitration and also the investment court system. The borders between litigation by courts and arbitration by arbitral tribunal continue to become less clear. Overall, international commercial courts should be considered as adding to the ecosystem of international dispute resolution rather than competing with other traditional forms such as international arbitration. New forms of international commercial courts may continue to evolve to expand beyond their current jurisdictional boundaries to possibly have an impact on the investment court system.