HOME / ¹®¼­¸¶ÄÏ / /

Áý´ÜÀÀÁý¼ºÀÇ Á¶Àý - ½æ³×ÀÏ 1page
1/1
  • 1 page

Áý´ÜÀÀÁý¼ºÀÇ Á¶Àý (±³À°¹æ¹ý¿¬±¸ Á¦ 27±Ç 2È£ pp.211-228(18 pages))

¼­½Ä¹øÈ£
TZ-SLE-1492759
µî·ÏÀÏÀÚ
2015.07.10
ºÐ·®
18 page
ÆǸŰ¡
3,000 ¿ø
ÆÄÀÏ Æ÷¸Ë
Adobe PDF (pdf)
Á¶È¸
66°Ç

µî·ÏÀÚ

ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹® ºê·£µå¼¥

µî±Þº° ÇýÅú¸±â

Áý´ÜÀÀÁý¼ºÀÇ Á¶Àý ¿¬±¸³í¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù

  • Adobe PDF (pdf)Adobe PDF (pdf)
Áý´ÜÀÀÁý¼ºÀÇÁý´ÜÀÀÁý¼ºÀÇÁ¶Àý
¿¬°ü ÃßõÀÚ·á
  • Áý´ÜÀÀÁý¼ºÀÇ Á¶Àý 1 page

Àüü 18 page Áß 1 page±îÁö ¹Ì¸®º¸±â°¡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¼Ò°³±Û

Á¦¸ñ : Çù·ÂÇнÀ¿¡¼­ ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý°ú Çù·ÂÀû ÀÚ±âÁ¶ÀýÀÇ °ü°è: Áý´Ü ÀÀÁý¼ºÀÇ Á¶ÀýÈ¿°ú¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ÀúÀÚ : ÀÓ±Ô¿¬, ¹ÚÇϳª, ±è½Ã¿ø
¹ßÇàÇÐȸ : Çѱ¹±³À°¹æ¹ýÇÐȸ [The Korean Association for Educational Methodology Studies]
¹ßÇàÁ¤º¸ : ±³À°¹æ¹ý¿¬±¸ Á¦ 27±Ç 2È£ pp.211-228(18 pages)
¹ßÇà³âµµ : 2015

ÀúÀ۽ñâ : 2015³â

¸ñÂ÷

¥°. ¼­ ·Ð
¥±. ÀÌ·ÐÀû ¹è°æ
¥². ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý
¥³. ¿¬±¸°á°ú
¥´. °á·Ð ¹× Á¦¾ð
Âü°í¹®Çå

º»¹®³»¿ë

º» ¿¬±¸´Â Çù·ÂÇнÀ »óȲ¿¡¼­ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý°ú Çù·ÂÀû ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý
°£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ½ÇÁõÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í, Áý´Ü ÀÀÁý¼ºÀÌ ±× °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Á¶Àýº¯¼ö·Î¼­ÀÇ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ´ÂÁö ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Çù·ÂÀû ÀÚ±âÁ¶ÀýÀº ´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µé°úÀÇ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ë °úÁ¤ ¼Ó¿¡¼­ °³ÀÎÀÇ ÀÚ±âÁ¶ÀýÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô º¯È­ÇÏ°í Á¤±³È­ µÇ´ÂÁö ¼³¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÑ °³³äÀ¸·Î, °³ÀÎÀÇ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý ½ºÅ³À» Áý´Ü ¸Æ¶ôÀ¸·Î ÀüȯÇÏ´Â °úÁ¤À¸·Î Á¤ÀǵȴÙ. ÀÌ´Â »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÃÖ±Ù¿¡ Á¶¸íÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Â ±¸ÀÎÀ¸·Î¼­, º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ Çù·ÂÀû ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇظ¦ È®ÀåÇÏ°í Çù·ÂÇнÀ ȯ°æ ¼³°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Ã»çÁ¡À» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀÌ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ ´ëÇлý 61¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼ÒÁý´Ü Çù·Â ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¸¦ ÁøÇàÇÏ°í °ü·Ã ¼³¹®À» ÅëÇØ ÀڷḦ ¼öÁýÇÑ ÈÄ À§°èÀû ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ °á°ú, ù°, ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ÀÚ±âÁ¶ÀýÀº Çù·ÂÀû ÀÚ±âÁ¶ÀýÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µÑ°, »çȸÀû ÀÀÁý¼ºÀº ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý°ú Çù·ÂÀû ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý °£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ Á¶ÀýÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼Â°, °ú¾÷ ÀÀÁý¼ºÀº ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý°ú Çù·ÂÀû ÀÚ±âÁ¶Àý °£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ Á¶ÀýÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Áï, Çù·Â¿¡ À־ Áý´ÜÀÇ ±¸¼º¿øº¸´Ù´Â °ú¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±àÁ¤Àû ¸ôÀÔÀÌ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇϹǷÎ, ÇнÀÀÚ¿¡°Ô ÀÇ¹Ì ÀÖ´Â °ú¾÷À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ°í ±×¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áý´ÜÀÇ ¸ñÇ¥¸¦ ¼¼¿ï ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ±³¼öÀÚÀÇ ¿ªÇÒÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â ½Ã»çÁ¡À» Á¦°øÇÑ´Ù.

This study analyzed the moder
ating effect of group cohesiveness on the relationship between selfregulation and co-regulation in a collaborative learning environment. Seventy three college studentsparticipated in a small group based collaborative project, and the data from sixty one were used forhierarchical regression analysis. The results reported that self regulation predicted co-regulation, and taskcohesiveness moderated the relationship between self regulation and co-regulation, while social cohesivenessdid not. This study investigated a relatively new construct, co-regulation, in a collaborative learningcontext, and reported the importance of group cohesiveness to strengthen the relationship betweenself-regulation and co-regulation. Also, this study suggested the significant role of instructors who shouldfacilitate group cohesiveness in terms of task by providing meaningful collaborative tasks as well asopportunities to establish shared goals and procedures within teams.   (ÀÌÇÏ »ý·«)

Âü°í¹®Çå

¾øÀ½

¹ÞÀº º°Á¡

0/5

0°³ÀÇ º°Á¡

¹®¼­°øÀ¯ ÀڷḦ µî·ÏÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
¹®¼­°øÀ¯ Æ÷ÀÎÆ®¿Í Çö±ÝÀ» µå¸³´Ï´Ù.

Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : ÀÚ·á 1°Ç´ç ÃÖ´ë 5,000P Áö±Þ

Çö±Ý : ÀÚ·á 1°Ç´ç ÃÖ´ë 2,000¿ø Áö±Þ

ÈıâÀÛ¼º»ç¿ëÈı⸦ ÀÛ¼ºÇÏ½Ã¸é ¹®¼­°øÀ¯ 100 point¸¦ Àû¸³ÇØ µå¸³´Ï´Ù.

¼­½Äº°Á¡ ¡Ù¡Ù¡Ù¡Ù¡Ù

0/120

»ç¿ëÈıâ (0)

µî·ÏµÈ ¸®ºä°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.

ù¹ø° ¸®ºä¾î°¡ µÇ¾îÁÖ¼¼¿ä.

ÀÌÀü1´ÙÀ½

ºê·£µå Á¤º¸

ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹®

ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹®

°í±Þ ³í¹®À» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹®Àº Àü¹® Çо÷ ºÐ¾ß¿¡ ÃÖ°íÀÇ ÀڷḦ º¸ÀåÇϸç
°¢Á¾ ¿¬±¸ »ç·Ê¿Í ¹Ì·¡ ºÐ¼® µîÀÇ ÀڷḦ ÅëÇØ Àι®ÇÐ, »çȸ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ±íÀÌ Àִ Ž»öÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µµ¿Íµå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.

ÆǸÅÀÚ·á ¼ö : 32,704°Ç