HOME / ¹®¼¸¶ÄÏ / ³í¹® / ¿¹Ã¼´ÉºÐ¾ß
°£È£´ëÇлýÀÇ ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ ÇൿÀǵµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎ ¿¬±¸³í¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù
Àüü 10 page Áß 1 page±îÁö ¹Ì¸®º¸±â°¡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¼Ò°³±Û
Á¦¸ñ : °£È£´ëÇлýÀÇ ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ ÇൿÀǵµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎ
ÀúÀÚ : °Áö¼÷, ¾çÀμ÷
¹ßÇàÇÐȸ : Çѱ¹À£´Ï½ºÇÐȸ [Korea society for wellness]
¹ßÇàÁ¤º¸ : Çѱ¹À£´Ï½ºÇÐȸÁö Á¦ 9±Ç 4È£ pp.101-110(10 pages)
¹ßÇà³âµµ : 2014
ÀúÀ۽ñâ : 2014³â 11¿ù
¸ñÂ÷
¥°. ¼ ·Ð
¥±. ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý
¥². ¿¬±¸°á°ú
¥³. ³í ÀÇ
¥µ. °á ·Ð
Âü°í¹®Çå
º»¹®³»¿ë
º» ¿¬±¸´Â °£È£´ëÇлýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ Çà
µ¿Àǵµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» ±Ô¸íÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿¬±¸¼³°è´Â ¼¼úÀû »ó°ü°ü°è ¿¬±¸·Î, Áö°¢µÈ Ãë¾à¼º, Áö°¢µÈ ½É°¢¼º, Áö°¢µÈ À̵æ, Áö°¢µÈ Àå¾Ö, Çൿ´Ü¼, Áúº´Áö½Ä ¹× ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ ÇൿÀǵµ·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ ±¸Á¶ÈµÈ Áú¹®Áö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÚ°¡ ±âÀÔ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. °æ»óºÏµµ¿Í Àü¶óºÏµµ ¼ÒÀç 2°³ Á¾ÇÕ´ëÇп¡ÀçÇÐ ÁßÀÎ °£È£´ëÇлý 328¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ ÇൿÀǵµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» È®ÀÎÇϱâ À§ÇØ ·ÎÁö½ºÆ½ ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ ÇൿÀǵµ´Â 33.5%·Î ³·Àº ¼öÁØÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ±âÀúÁúȯ(OR=4.070,95% CI=1.106-14.976, p=.035), Áö°¢µÈ ½É°¢¼º(OR=1.361, 95% CI=1.134-1.634, p=.001) ¹× Çൿ´Ü¼(OR=1.405, 95% CI=1.225-1.612,p¡´.001)°¡ ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ ÇൿÀǵµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Áï, ±âÀúÁúȯÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì, Áö°¢µÈ ½É°¢¼ºÀ̳ôÀ»¼ö·Ï, Çൿ´Ü¼¸¦ ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù°í ÀνÄÇÒ¼ö·Ï ÀÎÇ÷翣ÀÚ ¿¹¹æÁ¢Á¾ ÇൿÀǵµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ±âÀúÁúȯÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾ÊÀº °£È£´ëÇлý¿¡°Ô Áúº´ÀÇ ½É°¢¼ºÀ» ÀνĽÃų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±³À°Àû ÁßÀç¹æ¾È »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Çൿ´Ü¼¸¦ Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÆÔÇø´, µ¿¿µ»ó ¹×°³º°¡¤Áý´Ü±³À°°ú °°Àº Àü·«ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù ÇÏ°Ú´Ù.
This study investigated the i
nfluencing factors on behavior intention related to influenza vaccination among nursing students.Descriptive correlational and cross-sectional survey design was used. Participants were 328 nursing students who answered aself-administered questionnaire which included demographics, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefit,perceived barrier, action cues, disease knowledge, and behavior intention related to influenza vaccination. Data were analyzedusing logistic regression analysis. The subjects was showed relatively low level of behavior intention related to influenzavaccination with rates of 33.5%. In logistic regression analysis, underlying disease (OR=4.070, 95% CI=1.106-14.976, p=.035),perceived severity (OR=1.361, 95% CI=1.134-1.634, p=.001), and action cues (OR=1.405, 95% CI=1.225-1.612, p¡´.001) wereassociated with behavior intention related to influenza vaccination. The results indicate that various strategies such as educationdealing with influenza¡¯s severity and action cues including pamphlet, video, and individual and group education should bedeveloped to improve behavior intention related to influenza vaccination with nursing students who had not underlying disease (ÀÌÇÏ »ý·«)
Âü°í¹®Çå
¾øÀ½
¹ÞÀº º°Á¡
0/5
0°³ÀÇ º°Á¡
¹®¼°øÀ¯ ÀڷḦ µî·ÏÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
¹®¼°øÀ¯ Æ÷ÀÎÆ®¿Í Çö±ÝÀ» µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : ÀÚ·á 1°Ç´ç ÃÖ´ë 5,000P Áö±Þ
Çö±Ý : ÀÚ·á 1°Ç´ç ÃÖ´ë 2,000¿ø Áö±Þ
ÀúÀÛ±Ç Á¤º¸
À§ Á¤º¸ ¹× °Ô½Ã¹° ³»¿ëÀÇ Áø½Ç¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¾ÅÅ©Á¸Àº º¸ÁõÇÏÁö ¾Æ´ÏÇϸç, ÇØ´ç Á¤º¸ ¹× °Ô½Ã¹° ÀúÀ۱ǰú ±âŸ ¹ýÀû Ã¥ÀÓÀº ÀÚ·á µî·ÏÀÚ¿¡°Ô ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
À§ Á¤º¸ ¹× °Ô½Ã¹° ³»¿ëÀÇ ºÒ¹ýÀû ÀÌ¿ë, ¹«´Ü ÀüÀ硤¹èÆ÷´Â ±ÝÁöµÇ¾î ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
ÀúÀÛ±ÇħÇØ, ¸í¿¹ÈÑ¼Õ µî ºÐÀï¿ä¼Ò ¹ß°ß½Ã °í°´¼¾ÅÍÀÇ ÀúÀÛ±Ç Ä§ÇØ½Å°í¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
ºê·£µå Á¤º¸
°í±Þ ³í¹®À» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹®Àº Àü¹® Çо÷ ºÐ¾ß¿¡ ÃÖ°íÀÇ ÀڷḦ º¸ÀåÇϸç
°¢Á¾ ¿¬±¸ »ç·Ê¿Í ¹Ì·¡ ºÐ¼® µîÀÇ ÀڷḦ ÅëÇØ Àι®ÇÐ, »çȸ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ±íÀÌ Àִ Ž»öÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µµ¿Íµå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.
ÆǸÅÀÚ·á ¼ö : 32,704°Ç