HOME / ¹®¼­¸¶ÄÏ / /

¼­¿ï½Ã °ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸-´ÜÁö ³» Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ È°µ¿°ú ÁְŹ®È­ Ư¼º - ½æ³×ÀÏ 1page
1/1
  • 1 page

¼­¿ï½Ã °ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸-´ÜÁö ³» Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ È°µ¿°ú ÁְŹ®È­ Ư¼º

¼­½Ä¹øÈ£
TZ-SLE-1474407
µî·ÏÀÏÀÚ
2015.05.23
ºÐ·®
10 page
ÆǸŰ¡
2,000 ¿ø
ÆÄÀÏ Æ÷¸Ë
Adobe PDF (pdf)
Á¶È¸
74°Ç

µî·ÏÀÚ

ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹® ºê·£µå¼¥

µî±Þº° ÇýÅú¸±â

¼­¿ï½Ã °ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸-´ÜÁö ³» Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ È°µ¿°ú ÁְŹ®È­ Ư¼º ¿¬±¸³í¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù

  • Adobe PDF (pdf)Adobe PDF (pdf)
¼­¿ï½Ã¼­¿ï°ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ®°ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄƮĿ¹Â´ÏƼ»çȸÀû°á¼Ó·Â¿¬±¸´ÜÁöÈ°µ¿ÁְŹ®È­ÁְŹ®È­
¿¬°ü ÃßõÀÚ·á
  • ¼­¿ï½Ã °ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸-´ÜÁö ³» Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ È°µ¿°ú ÁְŹ®È­ Ư¼º 1 page

Àüü 10 page Áß 1 page±îÁö ¹Ì¸®º¸±â°¡ °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¼Ò°³±Û

Á¦¸ñ : ¼­¿ï½Ã °ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ - ´ÜÁö ³» Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ È°µ¿°ú ÁְŹ®È­ Ư¼ºÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î - ÀúÀÚ : ¼­º¸°æ
¹ßÇàÇÐȸ : Çѱ¹ÁÖ°ÅÇÐȸ [The Korean Housing Association]
¹ßÇàÁ¤º¸ : Çѱ¹ÁÖ°ÅÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý Á¦ 25±Ç 2È£ pp.45-54(10 pages)
¹ßÇà³âµµ : 2014

ÀúÀ۽ñâ : 2014³â 4¿ù

¸ñÂ÷

I. ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹è°æ°ú ¸ñÀû
II. Àú¼Òµæ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â
III. Àå±â°ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® ´ÜÁöÀÇ »çȸ°æÁ¦Àû ȯ°æ
IV. ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý ¹× ¹üÀ§
V. ¿¬±¸°á°ú
VI. °á ·Ð
REFERENCES

º»¹®³»¿ë

20¼¼±â ÈÄ¹Ý ´ëµµ½Ã¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ÁøÇàµÈ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ µµ½ÃÈ­´Â
¸¶À» ´ÜÀ§·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ® ÀÖ´ø ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ÁÖ°Å°øµ¿Ã¼ÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì¿Í ¿ªÇÒÀ» ºü¸£°Ô Åð»ö½ÃÄ×´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼­±¸ÀÇ »çȸÇÐÀÚµéÀº Çö´ë »çȸÀÇ µµ½ÃÈ­¿Í °³ÀÎÈ­ Çö»óÀº »çȸÀû ¾àÀÚ, Áï ¼Ò¼ö ¹ÎÁ·À̳ª Àå¾ÖÀÎ, Àú¼ÒµæÃþ, ³ëÀεéÀÇ »çȸÀû°í¸³À» Á¡Â÷ ¾ÇÈ­½ÃÅ°°í ÀÖ´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇß´Ù(see, for example,Durkheim, 1979). ÀÌ¿Í ÇÔ²² 1990³â´ë Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ °³¹ßÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ ºÎ°¢µÇ¸é¼­ ȯ°æÀûÀÎ Ãø¸é »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó »çȸÀûÀ¸·Îµµ Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ µµ½Ã¸¦ ¸¸µé±â À§Çؼ­´Â ÁÖ°Å°øµ¿Ã¼ÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â(social cohesion)ÀÌ °­È­µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺ÀÌ Á¦±âµÇ¾ú´Ù(Bramley & Power, 2009).ÁÖ°Å°øµ¿Ã¼ÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© Áß¿äÇÏ°Ô ´Ù·ç¾îÁö´Â ÀïÁ¡ Áß Çϳª´Â, ±×°ÍÀÌ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ ³»¿¡¼­ ½ÇÁúÀûÀ¸·Î ¾î¶°ÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ°í Àִ°¡ ÇÏ´Â Á¡ÀÌ´Ù. ij³ª´Ù, È£ÁÖ, ±×¸®°í ¼­À¯·´ ±¹°¡µéÀº ÀÌ¹Ì »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·ÂÀÌ Àú¼ÒµæÃþÀ» À§ÇÑ »çȸ Á¤Ã¥À¸·Î È°¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀ» È°¹ßÇÏ°Ô ¸ð»öÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó¿¡¼­´Â Á¤Ã¥ ¼ö´ÜÀ¸·Î¼­»çȸÀû °á¼Ó·ÂÀ» È°¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ³íÀÇ°¡ ¾ÆÁ÷ ¹ÌÈíÇÑ ÆíÀÌ´Ù. µµ½ÃÁö¿ªÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î »çȸ °á¼Ó·ÂÀÇ Á¤µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ¿¬±¸°¡ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª(see, for example, Cho, 2007; Kang &Hong-hyun, 2002), ±×°ÍÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô Àú¼Òµæ ÁÖ°Å°øµ¿Ã¼ÀÇÄ¿¹Â´ÏƼ È°µ¿À¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸´Â ºÎÁ·ÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ¿¬±¸°¡ ¼­¾ç ±¹°¡µé¿¡¼­ ³íÀÇµÈ À̷еéÀ» ±âÃÊ·Î ÇÏ°í À־ ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·ÂÀÇ ¹®È­Àû Ư¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ´õ¿í È°¹ßÇÏ°Ô ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ.º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ´ëÇ¥ÀûÀÎ Àú¼Òµæ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼÀÎ Àå±â°ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® ÁֹεéÀÌ Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·ÂÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ¿© »çȸÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ÁÖ°Å°øµ¿Ã¼¸¦ ¸¸µé±â À§ÇÑ Á¤Ã¥Àû ³íÀÇ¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ½ÇÁõÀû ÀڷḦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿Í ¿¬°èµÈ ¼±Ç࿬±¸(Seo & Chiu, 2014)¿¡¼­´Â °ø°øÀÓ´ë¾ÆÆÄÆ® ÁֹεéÀÇ »çȸ°á¼Ó·ÂÀÇ Á¤µµ¸¦ ÁöÇ¥¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¹Ù ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© º» ¿¬±¸´Â¼öÄ¡¸¦ ÅëÇؼ­´Â ÆľÇÇϱâ Èûµç »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·ÂÀÇ Æ¯¼º, Áï ÁֹεéÀÇ °á¼Ó·ÂÀÌ Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ È°µ¿¿¡ ¾î¶°ÇÑ ÇüÅ·Π³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, À̵éÀÇ »çȸÀû °á¼Ó·Â¿¡ ¹Ý¿µµÈ ÁÖ°Å ¹®È­ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀº ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

In line with the previous stu
dy on the level of social cohesiveness of public rental housing communities in Seoul, thisstudy investigated the community activities as a result of community cohesiveness and identified the cultural influenceson the cohesiveness of the same case study areas. In general, there was relatively more active and voluntaryparticipation of the residents in the community activities in the housing estates with higher social cohesiveness. The fourcommunities were active in reporting community problems to the housing managers, greatly relying on the housingmanagers to solve the problems. In addition, mutual aid and community self-help were facilitated mainly through theactivities of women¡¯s associations. However, small membership of community organisations and occasional disputesbetween the community organisations and estate managers, and among the community organisations themselves, seemedto have hampered the positive effects of the social cohesiveness in the case study areas. In terms of the culturalattributes, coexistence of collectivism and individualism, consideration of neighbourliness as an ideal social norm,incorporation of the neighbourhood environment into the housing estate environment and extensive use of outdoor publicspaces were found.   (ÀÌÇÏ »ý·«)

Âü°í¹®Çå

¾øÀ½

¹ÞÀº º°Á¡

0/5

0°³ÀÇ º°Á¡

¹®¼­°øÀ¯ ÀڷḦ µî·ÏÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
¹®¼­°øÀ¯ Æ÷ÀÎÆ®¿Í Çö±ÝÀ» µå¸³´Ï´Ù.

Æ÷ÀÎÆ® : ÀÚ·á 1°Ç´ç ÃÖ´ë 5,000P Áö±Þ

Çö±Ý : ÀÚ·á 1°Ç´ç ÃÖ´ë 2,000¿ø Áö±Þ

ÈıâÀÛ¼º»ç¿ëÈı⸦ ÀÛ¼ºÇÏ½Ã¸é ¹®¼­°øÀ¯ 100 point¸¦ Àû¸³ÇØ µå¸³´Ï´Ù.

¼­½Äº°Á¡ ¡Ù¡Ù¡Ù¡Ù¡Ù

0/120

»ç¿ëÈıâ (0)

µî·ÏµÈ ¸®ºä°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.

ù¹ø° ¸®ºä¾î°¡ µÇ¾îÁÖ¼¼¿ä.

ÀÌÀü1´ÙÀ½

ºê·£µå Á¤º¸

ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹®

ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹®

°í±Þ ³í¹®À» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ÇÐÁö»ç ´º³í¹®Àº Àü¹® Çо÷ ºÐ¾ß¿¡ ÃÖ°íÀÇ ÀڷḦ º¸ÀåÇϸç
°¢Á¾ ¿¬±¸ »ç·Ê¿Í ¹Ì·¡ ºÐ¼® µîÀÇ ÀڷḦ ÅëÇØ Àι®ÇÐ, »çȸ ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ±íÀÌ Àִ Ž»öÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µµ¿Íµå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.

ÆǸÅÀÚ·á ¼ö : 32,704°Ç